Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Number Two claims that the "General" will know who his accomplice was. The "General" is revealed to be a sophisticated, experimental mainframe computer which has purportedly been programmed to be able to answer any question put to it.

  2. Aug 22, 2023 · One who is complicit in committing criminal conduct is an accomplice. Although an accomplice does not actually commit the crime, their actions help someone in the commission of the crime. An accomplice cannot be charged with a more serious crime than the primary perpetrator.

  3. accomplice, in law, a person who becomes equally guilty in the crime of another by knowingly and voluntarily aiding the other to commit the offense. An accomplice is either an accessory or an abettor.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
    • Introduction
    • I. Overview of Accomplice Liability
    • A. Historical Approaches
    • B. A Recent Proposal: Splitting Intentions
    • Splitting Intentions

    Accomplice liability poses an enduring puzzle. It invites thestate to convict people of crimes they did not commit. Across the United States,a person can be convicted of grand larceny without pilfering a dime and jailedfor first-degree murder without drawing a drop of blood. This might seem like agross miscarriage of justice, but it is black-letter...

    The doctrine of complicity makes a person “legallyaccountable for the conduct of another person.”10A convicted accomplice to murder is, then, a convicted murderer, just like theprincipal (or perpetrator). These are two routes to the same criminalconviction, status, and range of punishments—to liability for the sameoffense. In a landmark case on com...

    In this Section, I consider two criteria for the mens rea ofcomplicity—knowledge and purpose—and find them, respectively, toowide and too narrow. By some federal and state authorities on the complicity mensrea, a helper need not intend that the principal commit his crime. It is enoughthat he know that the principal willcommit it. Thus, the Fourth C...

    Because of where these two approaches lead, GideonYaffe’s project has been to negotiate between them. But to see his middleway, we need some background. According to Yaffe and other philosophers of action,intentions give rise to two kinds of rational inclinations or dispositions.They do not just dispose us to promote what we intend. They also put u...

    It is worth describing in more detail how Yaffe and otherphilosophers of action think intentions normally work. Again, an example will help. Say Cassius-the-cashier decidesto sell the hammer to Brutus to aid the break-in. By Yaffe’s lights, Cassiuswill thus incur some reason (and become disposed) to do two things: 1. Take the steps necessary to pro...

  4. Jun 17, 2022 · While definitions tend to vary by state, an accomplice is generally someone who intentionally does something to encourage or help another person to commit a crime. In most cases, the accomplice doesn't have to participate in the crime to be guilty of aiding and abetting.

  5. The criminal act element required for an accessory in the majority of jurisdictions is aiding or assisting a principal in escape, concealment, or evasion of arrest and prosecution or conviction after the principal commits a felony (Va. Code Ann., 2010).

  6. People also ask

  7. Nov 10, 2022 · Without even a significant contribution, an accomplice is not meaningfully involved in the principal's crime. In complicity, like many other areas of English law, legal actors routinely and mistakenly sacrifice precision about doctrine for the sake of a purportedly practical application of the law.

  1. People also search for