Yahoo Web Search

Search results

    • 2 Samuel 12:6 - Bible Hub
      • … 5 David burned with anger against the man and said to Nathan: “As surely as the LORD lives, the man who did this deserves to die! 6 Because he has done this thing and has shown no pity, he must pay for the lamb four times over.” 7 Then Nathan said to David, “You are that man!
      biblehub.com/2_samuel/12-6.htm
  1. People also ask

  2. David's judgment was in accordance with the law for stealing a sheep (Exodus 21:37), but Zacchaeus' promise to pay fourfold was above what was required by the law, so the choice of paying specifically fourfold might have been chosen with the story about David in mind.

  3. The fourfold restoration corresponds to the law in Exodus 22:1. The culprit himself was also to be put to death, because the forcible robbery of a poor man's pet-lamb was almost as bad as man-stealing.

  4. Jul 1, 2016 · When theft is involved, David mentions a 4 times repayment when being confronted by Nathan, and Zaccheus mentions that same 4 times repayment to bring restitution for the things he has stolen.

  5. He shall make fourfold restitution for the lamb because he has done this and was unsparing.” NET Bible Because he committed this cold-hearted crime, he must pay for the lamb four times over!"

  6. Jan 17, 2023 · David grew very angry with that man and said to Nathan: “As the LORD lives, the man who has done this deserves death! He shall make fourfold restitution for the lamb because he has done this and was unsparing.” Then Nathan said to David: “You are that man! Nathan’s Indictment.

  7. Nathan Reproves David. 5 Then David’s anger burned greatly against the man, and he said to Nathan, “As the Lord lives, surely the man who has done this deserves to die. 6 He must make restitution for the lamb fourfold, because he did this thing and had no compassion.” 7 Nathan then said to David, “ You are the man!

  8. The sentence actually passed, of fourfold restitution, is exactly in accordance with the Mosaic Law (Exodus 22:1), but the moral turpitude of the offence was far greater than could be atoned for by the legal penalty. Rightly, therefore, David expressed his indignation, and regretted that the sentence was so light; but a judge must not strain ...