Search results
Question 1: Do you consider that the Devani interpretation should be ‘overruled’ by rule change to UT rule 24 (Option 1)? If so, why; and if not, why not?
May 18, 2021 · This is the outcome of the consultation on possible changes to rule 24 of the Upper Tribunal Rules 2008. This publication contains a summary of the consultation responses and includes the...
A consultation (the “Consultation”) ran over the period May to July 2021, its purpose being to seek views as to possible changes to UT rule 24. That rule concerns the provision, by. a...
- The Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
- Question 4
- Question 6
- Question 8
- Question 10
- Social Entitlement Chamber
- Health, Education & Social Care Chamber
- War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber
- General Regulatory Chamber
- Immigration and Asylum Chamber
- Tax Chamber
28. The Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), (the “UT(AAC)”), is responsible for dealing with appeals against decisions made by certain Chambers of the F-tT, and certain decisions made by others. These include: social security and child support (appeals from F-tT(SEC)) war pensions and armed forces compensation (appeals from F-tT(WPAFCC...
If so, do you have any comments on the indicative drafting?
If so, do you have any comments on the indicative drafting?
If so, do you have any comments on the indicative drafting?
If so, do you have any comments on the indicative drafting? Generally
This Chamber is responsible for handling appeals against decisions relating to: Attendance Allowance Bereavement Allowance Carer’s Allowance Child Benefit child maintenance (child support) Compensation Recovery Scheme (including NHS recovery claims) Diffuse Mesotheliomia Payment Scheme Disability Living Allowance Employment Support Allowance funera...
This Chamber deals with Special Education Needs & Disability (SEND), Care Standards (CS), and Primary Health Lists (PHL). The SEND jurisdiction deals with parents’/carers appeals against decisions of local authorities about children’s special educational needs. Care Standards hearings principally concern regulatory breaches enforced by the Care Q...
This Chamber deals with appeals against decisions about a war pension or compensation.
This Chamber is responsible for handling appeals against decisions made by government regulatory bodies in cases relating to: charities community right to bid consultant lobbyists conveyancing copyright licensing driving instructors electronic communications and postal services environment exam boards food gambling immigration services information ...
This Chamber is responsible for handling appeals against some decisions made by the Home Office relating to: permission to stay in the UK deportation from the UK entry clearance to the UK It also handles applications for immigration bail from people being held by the Home Office on immigration matters.
This Chamber is responsible for handling appeals against some decisions made by HMRC relating to: Income Tax PAYE tax Corporation Tax Capital Gains Tax National Insurance Contributions Statutory Sick Pay Statutory Maternity Pay Inheritance Tax VAT Excise duty Customs duty It also handles some appeals relating to goods seized by either HM Revenue an...
- 611KB
- 61
Oct 30, 2012 · Rule 24(3)(e) requires the respondent to state if it intends to rely on grounds that were unsuccessful “in the proceedings which are the subject of the appeal” but intends to rely on in the...
Aug 3, 2021 · On 6 May 2021, the respondent filed a response of the same date under rule 24 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 (the "UT Rules") which stated, inter alia, that the...
People also ask
What is UT rule 24 11?
Should UT rule 24 be changed?
Can a respondent rely on a 'purposive interpretation' of UT rule 24?
When did UT rule 24 come into effect?
Can a respondent seek PTA in a UT rule 24 response?
Is UT rule 7 a 'business' of the Upper Tribunal 24?
Aug 1, 2023 · If those submissions were not accepted, he should still be granted an extension of time to either admit grounds of appeal against the First-tier Tribunal or an amended Rule 24 challenging the...
