Search results
Nov 18, 2022 · In the opening dialogue of Ancient Apocalypse, Hancock rejects being identified as an archaeologist or scientist. Instead, he calls himself a journalist who is “investigating human...
- Flint Dibble
Hancock's pseudo-archaeological work is defined by a narrative based on cherry picked information, and strident opposition to "mainstream archaeology." It superficially resembles investigative journalism, but is neither accurate, consistent or impartial.
Nov 18, 2022 · John Hoopes: Graham Hancock is not and does not want to be seen as a scientist or a historian. He is coming from a metaphysical place. He’s inspired by Western esoterica. For him, the...
- Rebecca Onion
Nov 12, 2022 · Graham Hancock is a British author, writer, and former journalist. He has written prolifically for The Times and The Guardian and published many works about the fall of ancient civilizations. The 72-year-old writer has often been criticized for his pseudo-scientific works and, so far, has written 12 books on the subject that, despite his ...
Nov 22, 2022 · An archaeologist has branded the new Netflix documentary series Ancient Apocalypse an 'attack' on his profession. In the series, journalist Graham Hancock travels to different historical sites around the world in a quest for evidence of mysterious, lost civilizations dating back to the last Ice Age.
- Gregory Robinson
Nov 12, 2022 · The British journalist and pseudo-archeologist has a strong disdain for professionals in the field that he has worked in over the past thirty years, even publishing twelve books. Once you hear his theories about ancient history, it becomes clear why.
People also ask
Why does Hancock call a journalist a 'pseudo scientist'?
Who is Graham Hancock in Ancient Apocalypse?
What is Hancock's pseudo-archaeological work?
Is Graham Hancock a scientist or a historian?
Dec 7, 2022 · Hancock has been a known figure in the world of pseudoarchaeology for many years, a kind of Erich von Däniken version 2.0, save for the aliens. But the archaeologists’ main grievance in this case relates to Hancock’s direct attack on archeologists and the entire field of archaeology.
