Search results
Joe Biden’s big blunder: how the war in Ukraine became a global disaster | Simon Tisdall
Reflecting the instincts of a cold war veteran, Joe Biden’s strategy was familiar: contain the conflict. When the US president...
The Guardian
2 days ago
Opinion - This year’s Nobel Peace Prize rings the alarm about the nuclear threat
It is unknown when Putin may...the size, structure and role of nuclear weapons in American defense a...
The Hill via Yahoo
3 days ago
Understanding why the United States was successful in each of these areas then offers valuable lessons for deterrence today and provides an example for how the United States should approach deterring its current adversaries. During the Cold War, the American public had a shared general understanding on the nature of the Soviet Union.
the United States itself. Extended deterrence involves discourag-ing attacks on third parties, such as allies or partners. During the Cold War, direct deterrence involved discouraging a Soviet nuclear attack on U.S, territory; extended deterrence involved preventing a Soviet conventional attack on North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members.9
- 159KB
- 14
They believe that our prior actions, in the Gulf War, and during the Cold War before that, show that we will use our military when we deem the provocation to be sufficiently serious. Page 21. Suggested Citation: "1 Deterrence: An Overview." National Research Council. 1997. Post-Cold War Conflict Deterrence.
Sep 28, 2010 · Summary. The main purpose of this chapter is to argue that European détente was, first and foremost, a European project. While there is no denying the significance of the United States and the Soviet Union in the shaping of Europe’s fortunes in the 1960s and 1970s, détente actually began (and continued far longer) in Europe.
- Jussi Hanhimäki
- 2010
Jun 5, 2012 · What emerged in the US, and to a lesser extent Europe, during the 1940s and 1950s was a category of work at the intersection of military expertise and university based social science, aimed at addressing the policy problems arising from nuclear weapons and the broad-spectrum challenge posed to the West by the Soviet Union.
- Barry Buzan, Lene Hansen
- 2009
Their search for deterrence reversed cause and effect and prolonged the cold war. The history of the cold war provides compelling evidence of the pernicious effects of the open-ended quest for nuclear deterrence. But nuclear weapons also moderated superpower behavior, once leaders in Moscow and Washington.
People also ask
Why did the US use deterrence in Europe during the Cold War?
What was extended deterrence in the Cold War?
How did the United States deter the Soviet Union?
Why was deterrence important during WW2?
How has deterrence changed since the Cold War?
Why did the US stop using nuclear weapons during the Cold War?
deterrence, military strategy under which one power uses the threat of reprisal effectively to preclude an attack from an adversary power. With the advent of nuclear weapons, the term deterrence largely has been applied to the basic strategy of the nuclear powers and of the major alliance systems. The premise of the strategy is that each ...
