Search results
Mar 13, 2019 · Launching his career in electoral politics in the post-Civil Rights era, Hayakawa lived out the same paradox. Being a Japanese American lawmaker who would refuse to represent the majority of the Japanese, Asian, or any other minority communities became one of his major political assets.
- Yusuke Torii
- torii@ilc.setsunan.ac.jp
- 2019
Dec 1, 2012 · In December 1968 S. I. Hayakawa, the interim president of San Francisco State College, gained fame when he pulled the wires from the loudspeakers on a protester's truck during a student strike. Television cameras caught the moment on tape.
The trajectory of Hayakawa’s political career reflected a drastic reconfiguration of ideas about race as an outcome of the short, or classical, Civil Rights Movement.
- Yusuke Torii
- 2019
Although better remembered today as a reactionary conservative who opposed the Japanese American Redress Movement and bilingual education, he had been known as an anti-racist liberal who was...
This week establishes a social and political context of the post-War but pre-1965 era and the ideological tensions that emerge following the civil rights victories of the mid-1960s. Between World War II and the late 1960s, black Americans made remarkable advances educationally, economically and politically.
- 140KB
- 19
1 Sitkoff, Harvard, A New Deal for Blacks: The Emergence of Civil Rights as a National Issue (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), 335 Google Scholar; Norrell, Robert J., Reaping the Whirlwind: The Civil Rights Movement in Tuskegee (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985), x Google Scholar; Korstad, Robert and Lichtenstein, Nelson ...
From their point of view, Reconstruction was a tragic period of American history in which vengeful White Northern radicals took over the South. In order to punish the White Southerners they had just defeated in the Civil War, these Radical Republicans gave ignorant freedmen the right to vote.
People also ask
Why did Hayakawa become a political leader in the post-Civil Rights era?
How did Hayakawa change American racial politics?
Why was Hayakawa opposed to Black Studies?
Why did Hayakawa become a columnist?
Was Hayakawa's racial liberalism obsolete?
How did Hayakawa use his identity?