Search results
Mar 29, 2019 · In the light of historical prejudices against psychosocial causation deriving from physicalist reductionism and dualism, recognised by Engel and current commentators on the biopsychosocial model, this is a non-trivial task that occupies subsequent chapters.
- Derek Bolton, Grant Gillett
- 10.1007/978-3-030-11899-0_1
- 2019
- 2019/03/29
In the work of the physician, Dr Engel proposed disciplined study of those bonds to enrich personal connections, to promote understanding of patient and illness and to sustain the physician through emotionally and intellectually meaningful work.
- Peter A Engel, Anna G Engel
- 2002
Nov 8, 2021 · The term “biopsychosocial” was arguably first coined by Roy Grinker in 1952. Spurred on by his interest in systems theory, Engel expanded upon the model in 1977 and used it to hypothesise about the integration of mind and body. Despite its shortcomings, the BPS model remains relevant and useful.
- William Lugg
- 2021
Nov 1, 2005 · Psychoanalysis and Dr. Engel’s studies with Theresa Benedek played a part in his broadened syncretic view, providing a concept of symbolic use of the body for the expression of fantasy, conflict, or affect.
Jul 21, 2017 · Abstract. The biopsychosocial model outlined in Engel’s classic Science paper four decades ago emerged from dissatisfaction with the biomedical model of illness, which remains the dominant healthcare model.
- Derick T Wade, Peter W Halligan
- 2017
Psychoanalysis and Dr. Engel’s studies with Theresa Benedek played a part in his broadened syncretic view, providing a concept of symbolic use of the body for the expression of fantasy, conflict, or affect.
People also ask
Why did Engel write about the biopsychosocial model?
What did George Engel believe?
Is Engel's BPS model still relevant?
What does Engel say about the value of a scientific model?
Who was Dr Engel?
What did Engel say about biomedical physics and chemistry?
Apr 20, 2018 · Towards the end of his 1980 paper, Engel reminded us that the value of a scientific model should be measured not by whether it is right or wrong, but how useful it is. He contrasts the scientific model with dogma, which resists change and tends to promote opposition from rival “dissident figures”.
