Search results
Oct 4, 2024 · The decision was handed down that Diarra, who had filed a counterclaim, was required, as set out in a 2016 hearing at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, to pay €10.5m to the Russian side. The sum was the value on the Lokomotiv balance sheet that Diarra was said to have still held.
- Dave Powell
Oct 1, 2024 · In 2013, Lassana Diarra signed a four-year contract with Lokomotiv Moscow. Due to the club reducing his salary, Diarra chose to leave the club prior to the expiry of his contract. In response, Lokomotiv Moscow formally terminated his contract and took the matter to FIFA's Dispute Resolution Chamber (“ DRC ”), alleging that Mr Diarra had ...
Oct 4, 2024 · The verdict delivered by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on Friday — also known as the Lassana Diarra ruling — will almost certainly lead to significant change in the game.
Oct 4, 2024 · Diarra, Dupont, the French players’ union and Fifpro argue this delay and the underlying rules represented a breach of European Union labour law. They decided to sue Fifa and the Belgium...
Oct 4, 2024 · A long-running legal battle between Lassana Diarra and Fifa has ended with the European Court of Justice finding in favour of the former Chelsea and Arsenal midfielder.
- Daniel Austin
Oct 4, 2024 · Lassana Diarra, a former Arsenal and Chelsea midfielder, sued FIFA for damages in the Belgian courts, claiming two of its rules led to the collapse of a 2014 move to Belgian club Charleroi after the termination of his contract with Lokomotiv Moscow, which still had three years left to run.
People also ask
What happened to Diarra?
Why did Diarra file a complaint with the European Commission?
What happened between Lassana Diarra and FIFA?
Did the court sided with Diarra?
Will the European Court of Justice rule on the Lassana Diarra case?
Why did Diarra get a contract with Charleroi?
Diarra filed a complaint with the European Commission, arguing that FIFA's regulations violated EU competition law and the free movement of workers. The Commission declined to pursue the complaint, leading Diarra to challenge this decision before the General Court of the EU.
