Search results
Nicholas Hoult's new movie debuts with strong Rotten Tomatoes rating
Juror #2, the new film starring Nicholas Hoult and Toni Collette, has landed a strong rating on ...directorial effort from the legendary ...
Digital Spy
2 days ago
‘Juror #2’ Review: If This Riveting Courtroom Drama Becomes Clint Eastwood’s Final Film Then He Is Finishing On...
Clint Eastwood’s 42nd and possibly last film as director (hope not), Juror #2, also happens to be his best since American Sniper. At 94, this remarkable filmmaker not only ...
Deadline via Yahoo
5 days ago
Jack Klugman
- Jack Klugman As Juror #5 Representing the very same kids that were being demonized by other jurors, Juror #5 was the youngest member of the panel, and its most spirited. Jack Klugman was also the youngest cast member, and 12 Angry Men was his third film role.
screenrant.com/12-angry-men-cast-character-guide/
People also ask
Who was the youngest juror in 12 Angry Men?
Is Juror 3 really guilty in 12 Angry Men?
Does Juror 8 split the jury in 12 Angry Men?
Who was Juror 4 in 12 Angry Men?
Is 12 Angry Men based on a true story?
How did Juror 8 win 12 Angry Men?
The Foreman (The 1st Juror) A high school football coach. The Foreman takes his role seriously and attempts to maintain order throughout the heated proceedings.
- The Characters of 'Twelve Angry Men'
- Juror #8
- Juror #9
- Juror #5
- Juror #11
- Juror #2
- Juror #6
- Juror #7
- Juror #12
- Foreman
Instead of organizing the jurors in numeric order, the characters are listed here in the order they decide to vote in favor of the defendant. This progressive look at the cast is important for the final outcome of the play, as one jurorafter another changes their mind about the verdict.
He votes “not guilty” during the jury’s first vote. Described as "thoughtful" and "gentle," Juror #8 is usually portrayed as the most heroic member of the jury. He is devoted to justice and is right away sympathetic toward the 19-year-old defendant. Juror #8 spends the rest of the play urging the others to practice patience and to contemplate the d...
Juror #9 is described in the stage notes as a “mild gentle old man...defeated by life and...waiting to die.” Despite this bleak description, he is the first to agree with Juror #8, deciding that there is not enough evidence to sentence the young man to death and becomes more and more sure of himself as the play proceeds. During Act One, Juror #9 is...
This young man is nervous about expressing his opinion, especially in front of the elder members of the group. In Act One, his allure makes others believe that he is the one who changed his mind during the secret vote. But, it wasn't him; he didn't dare go against the rest of the group yet. However, it is also his experience from the slums where he...
As a refugee from Europe, Juror #11 has witnessed great injustices. That is why he is intent on administering justice as a jury member. He sometimes feels self-conscious about his foreign accent, but overcomes his shyness and is willing to take on a more active part in the decision-making process. He conveys a deep appreciation for democracy and Am...
He is the timidest man of the group. For the 1957 adaptation, he was played by John Fielder (the voice of “Piglet” from Disney’s Winnie the Poohcartoons). Juror #2 is easily persuaded by the opinions of others and cannot explain the roots of his convictions. In the very beginning, he goes along with the general opinion, but soon Juror #8 wins his s...
Described as an “honest but dull-witted man,” Juror #6 is a house painter by trade. He is slow to see the good in others but eventually agrees with Juror #8. He defies the adversity and pursues the facts, in search of a more complete and objective picture. Juror #6 is the one who calls for another ballot and is also one of the first six pro-acquitt...
A slick, superior, and sometimes obnoxious salesman, Juror #7 admits during Act One that he would have done anything to miss jury duty and is trying to get out of it as fast as possible. He represents the many real-life individuals who loathe the idea of being on a jury. He is also quick to add his piece of mind to the conversation. He seems to wan...
He is an arrogant and impatient advertising executive. Juror #12 is anxious for the trial to be over so that he also can get back to his career and his social life. However, after Juror #5 tells the group about his knowledge of knife-fights, Juror #12 is the first one to waver in his conviction, eventually changing his mind to "not guilty."
Non-confrontational, Juror #1 serves as the foreman of the jury. He is serious about his authoritative role and wants to be as fair as possible. Despite being described as "not overly bright," he helps calm down the tensions and moves the conversation onward with professional urgency. He sides with the "guilty" side until, just like Juror #12, he c...
- Wade Bradford
Mar 23, 2023 · Representing the very same kids that were being demonized by other jurors, Juror #5 was the youngest member of the panel, and its most spirited. Jack Klugman was also the youngest cast member, and 12 Angry Men was his third film role. Klugman would continue to make movies, but it was on TV that he found his greatest success.
- Dalton Norman
- Senior Staff Writer
Oct 13, 2024 · Based on Reginald Rose’s 1954 teleplay (not a book), 12 Angry Men shows the deliberations of a jury on a murder case in which a young boy is accused of killing his father and facing the death penalty. At first, the jury is nearly unanimous in finding the young man guilty, but the deliberations continue when Juror 8 (Henry Fonda) dissents.
Reginald Rose's screenplay for 12 Angry Men, titled Twelve Angry Men, was initially produced for television and was inspired by a jury summons. [18] Although it is unclear what trial he was summoned to, [a] according to Rose, in early 1954, he served as a juror on a manslaughter case in the New York Court of General Sessions. Though he and the ...
Accused kid. Although the accused youth never appears as a character on stage, discussion of his actions and motivations drives the play. The youth is referred to as a “kid” by many of the jurors. He grew… read analysis of Accused kid.
The play explores the deliberations of a jury of a homicide trial, in which a dozen "men with ties and a coat" decide the fate of a teenager accused of murdering his abusive father. In the beginning, they are nearly unanimous in concluding the youth is guilty, influenced by their own background and upbringing. [1]