Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. link.springer.com › article › 10Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   May 16, 2018 · As evidence he cites Meier (1998), 1 who in turn quotes, for instance, Holmes (1990) and Olshtain (1989). Holmes (1990: 167) reports 96% of apologies in New Zealand English to contain an IFID, and Olshtain (1989: 164) 75% in Australian English.

   • Author: Andreas H. Jucker
   • Email: ahjucker@es.uzh.ch

   • Publish Year: 2018

2. www.sciencedirect.com › science › article“Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jul 1, 2017 · We took an initial list of Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs) associated with the speech act of apology, and used a novel form of collocational analysis to reveal “hidden manifestations” (Kohnen, 2007) of apologies in the BBC.

   • Author: Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe

   • Publish Year: 2017

3. www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk › 4794“Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”: A corpus pragmatic ...

   www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk › 4794

   • Cached

   This chapter studies the form oops and its function as an Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) signalling apologies in a corpus of blog posts and reader comments.

   • Author: Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe

   • Publish Year: 2017

4. link.springer.com › article › 10“I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for Apologies ...

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Feb 15, 2017 · By taking a closer look at language use in this online medium we aim to gain further insights into identifying the speech act of apology in online data. IFID Selection. In constructing our initial word list, we followed Deutschmann and included the eight core apology IFIDs: afraid, apologise, apology, excuse, forgive, pardon, regret and sorry.

   • Author: Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe

   • Publish Year: 2017

5. www.researchgate.net › figure › Frequency-of-perFrequency of performative apology expressions (IFIDs) in the ...

   www.researchgate.net › figure › Frequency-of-per

   Citations. ... Goffman (1971) defined remedial work as a sequence of remedial interchanges in which people try to change the meaning of an action that may be considered offensive to an...

6. storage.googleapis.com › jnl-up-j-irsp-filesThese Are Not Just Words: A Cross-National Comparative Study ...

   storage.googleapis.com › jnl-up-j-irsp-files

   Jul 8, 2021 · Most apologies, however, do contain an IFID, an acknowledgment of wrongdoing and a recognition of suffering, although there is vari-ation in how this is expressed. This variation can be linked to the receiving group (i.e., within-country or not), the contentiousness of the apology in a country and – albeit weakly – the cultural context ...

7. People also ask

   Who cites IFID apologies?

   • As evidence he cites Meier (1998), 1 who in turn quotes, for instance, Holmes (1990) and Olshtain (1989). Holmes (1990: 167) reports 96% of apologies in New Zealand English to contain an IFID, and Olshtain (1989: 164) 75% in Australian English. However, Holmes used the diary method and Olshtain discourse completion tasks (DCTs).

   Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41701-018-0038-y

   See all results for this question

   Are IFIDs associated with the speech act of apology?

   • We took an initial list of Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs) associated with the speech act of apology, and used a novel form of collocational analysis to reveal “hidden manifestations” ( Kohnen, 2007) of apologies in the BBC.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

   Is the IFID apologies the overwhelming favorite?

   • 1 3 have conrmed that the IFID sorryis “the overwhelming favorite” (Meier, 1998: p. 216), ranging from 79% of all apologies in New Zealand English (cf. Hol- mes, 1990) to 84% in spoken British English (cf. Aijmer, 1996).

   Conceptualizing Illocutions in Context: A Variationist ... - Springer

   link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41701-022-00115-w.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Is OOPs an apology IFID?

   • In this paper, we look more closely at the uses of oops as an apology IFID in the BBC. Our initial analyses suggest that, although oops is often accompanied by a prototypical apology IFID such as sorry, this is not always the case and it appears that oops may be acting as an apology IFID in its own right in blog data.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

   Is OOPs an illocutionary force indicating device with an apology function?

   • Oops as an Illocutionary Force Indicating Device with an apology function in blogs. Combining the analysis of shared and unique collocates to uncover new IFIDs. This article studies the form oops and its function as an Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) signalling apologies in a corpus of blog posts and reader comments.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

   Why do we use apology IFIDs in a blog?

   • That is to say that the form oops displays apologetic illocutionary force in the medium of the blog, in addition to the more routinised apology IFIDs but with the added stylistic effect of creating a conversational and colloquial impression in a written type of text, thus contributing to an increased perception of communicative immediacy.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

8. link.springer.com › content › pdfConceptualizing Illocutions in Context: A Variationist ...

   link.springer.com › content › pdf

   More recent influential studies, which have zoomed in on investigating IFIDs themselves, have confirmed that the IFID sorry is “the overwhelming favorite” (Meier, 1998: p. 216), ranging from 79% of all apologies in New Zealand English (cf. Hol-mes, 1990) to 84% in spoken British English (cf. Aijmer, 1996).