Search results
People also ask
What is a scoping review?
What makes a good scoping review?
What is a scoping review checklist?
When is a scoping review better than a systematic review?
What are the indications for scoping reviews?
What should be included in a scoping review?
Scoping reviews are conducted to map the literature available on a topic in a systematic way. Scoping reviews are useful when an area of research is new or emerging, heterogeneous and/or complex. Scoping reviews can be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance.
- 2MB
- 49
- What Is A Scoping Review and How Is It Different from Other Evidence Syntheses?
- Guidance to Improve The Quality of Reporting of Scoping Reviews
- Reasons For Conducting A Scoping Review
- Future Directions in Scoping Reviews
A scoping review is a type of evidence synthesis that has the objective of identifying and mapping relevant evidence that meets pre-determined inclusion criteria regarding the topic, field, context, concept or issue under review. The review question guiding a scoping review is typically broader than that of a traditional systematic review. Scoping ...
Since the first 2005 framework for scoping reviews (then termed ‘scoping studies’) , the popularity of this approach has grown, with numbers doubling between 2014 and 2017 . The PRISMA-ScR is the most up-to-date and advanced approach for reporting scoping reviews which is largely based on the popular PRISMA statement and checklist, the JBI methodol...
Whilst systematic reviews sit at the top of the evidence hierarchy, the types of research questions they address are not suitable for every application . Many indications more appropriately require a scoping review. For example, to explore the extent and nature of a body of literature, the development of evidence maps and summaries; to inform futur...
The field of evidence synthesis is dynamic. Scoping review methodology continues to evolve to account for the changing needs and priorities of end users and the requirements of review authors for additional guidance regarding terminology, elements and steps of scoping reviews. Areas where ongoing research and development of scoping review guidance ...
- Micah D. J. Peters, Micah D. J. Peters, Casey Marnie, Heather Colquhoun, Chantelle M. Garritty, Susa...
- 2021
Feb 4, 2021 · Scoping reviews are an invaluable form of evidence synthesis. Foundational concepts and evidence can be mapped, allowing for examination of practice, policy, and research and gaps in evidence and policy can be identified.
- Danielle Pollock, Ellen L Davies, Micah D J Peters, Micah D J Peters, Micah D J Peters, Andrea C Tri...
- 2021
Scoping reviews: an overview with examples. Example: Strengthening clinical governance in low- and middle-income countries. Examples of non-health related scoping reviews. Doing scoping reviews. Polling questions and Q&A session.
Scoping reviews are a type or evidence synthesis that aims to systematically identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept or issues, often irrespective of source (ie. primary research, reviews, non-empirical evidence) within or across particular contexts. Munn et al 2022.
May 14, 2019 · A scoping review aims to systematically explore and map the research available from a wide range of sources. The objective of this study was to produce a scoping review checklist to guide future scoping studies to enable rigorous review and critique of phenomena of interest.
Jun 26, 2024 · Scoping Reviews are best: When a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed, or exhibits a large, complex, or heterogeneous nature not amenable to a more precise systematic review. They are used to map existing literature in terms of nature, features, and volume.
