Search results
People also ask
What is the oldest evidence of life on Earth?
When was life first found on Earth?
What is the oldest form of life on Earth?
Where did the earliest life forms come from?
Are these the oldest fossils on Earth?
How long did life last on Earth?
The age of Earth is about 4.54 billion years; [7] [33] [34] the earliest undisputed evidence of life on Earth dates from at least 3.5 billion years ago according to the stromatolite record. [35] Some computer models suggest life began as early as 4.5 billion years ago.
Sep 19, 2022 · When did life on Earth begin? Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. Scientists think that by 4.3 billion years ago, Earth may have developed conditions suitable to support life. The oldest known fossils, however, are only 3.7 billion years old.
Mar 1, 2017 · At present, perhaps the oldest acknowledged evidence of life on the planet is found in 3.48-billion-year-old rocks in Western Australia. Dominic Papineau. The fossils were discovered...
- Overview
- Hunting Life’s Leftovers
- A Critical Moment
- Looking Beyond Earth
Found embedded in crystal, the structures seem to be fossils formed around hydrothermal vents as much as 4.28 billion years ago.
Stalks of iron-rich minerals, each a fraction the size of an eyelash, may be evidence of the earliest life-forms to inhabit the newborn planet Earth. The tiny hematite tubes are as much as 4.28 billion years old, according to the scientists announcing the find, and they are stunningly similar to structures produced by microbes living around undersea hydrothermal vents.
Discovered in slices of rock recovered from northern Quebec, the microscopic metallic detritus—plus chemical signatures associated with ancient metabolisms—could push back the date at which life arose on Earth. If verified, these fossils would surpass 3.7-billion-year-old microbial mats found in Greenland as the oldest known traces of life.
The microfossils also lend support to the idea that the warm, watery, mineral-rich neighborhoods around submerged vents are prime places for life to emerge, whether on this planet, on the seafloors of icy moons, or elsewhere in the universe.
1:47
“If indeed their analyses and interpretations are correct, then life arose rapidly on Earth, soon after the planet itself began to stabilize,” says astrobiologist Kevin Hand of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “As the froth of geology began to cool, biology established its role as a planetary process.”
In 2008, a team led by University College London’s Dominic Papineau collected the rocks from the Nuvvuagittuq formation along the eastern shore of Hudson Bay, where an ancient vent once spilled lava onto the seafloor. Among the oldest known fragments of Earth, the rocks preserve clues about the planet’s prehistoric marine environment.
Rather than looking for tiny fossils, the team was searching for something more subtle: The organic fingerprints of early organisms.
“There’s a long-standing hypothesis that the origin of life may be in hydrothermal environments, and these vent deposits were certainly very promising to search for signs of early life,” says UCL graduate student Matthew Dodd.
The team sliced their rocky clutch into thin sections. Taking a close look with a microscope, scientists noticed the fossils, which are tucked into crystals embedded in the rocks. Though minuscule, the structures were remarkably intricate and complex, and that made the team suspect they were seeing something more important than organic fingerprints.
But the scientists proceeded with caution.
If finding filamentous signs of life with potential astrobiological significance sounds familiar, that’s because it is. In 1996, scientists peering at a Martian meteorite recovered from Antarctica also spotted what looked like the tube-shaped remnants of organisms. The discovery ignited arguments that continue to this day, although the general scientific consensus is that the Martian structures are not of biological origin.
But not everyone is convinced.The chemical evidence for life—particularly the team’s assessment of those carbon compounds—is weak and ambiguous, says Dina Bower, a geobiologist at NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
And even though the authors say they refuted the possibility, she still thinks it’s possible the tubes and filaments were formed by hydrothermal fluid flow or another process that deformed the rocks.
“I am not convinced the structures are biogenic,” Bower says.
Even if the sheaths are indeed fossils, there’s still the unresolved issue of their age. Based on two different isotopic clocks used to date the rocks, Dodd and his colleagues suggest the microfossils could be as young as 3.77 billion years old—and perhaps a whopping 4.28 billion years old.
But scientists such as Kelly maintain that in such complex rocks, determining the relative ages of features is difficult, and assigning such an ancient age to the fossils is not accurate. Instead, he says, it’s possible the structures containing those fossils (if they’re real) are younger than 2.7 billion years.
At this time, the entire Nuvvuagittuq formation was substantially altered by tectonically driven cycles of high pressure and temperature, which could have stretched, bent, and distorted the rocks, destroying any existing fossils.
If the story holds up, the relative complexity of these organisms suggests they evolved long before they shed their iron skins and were thriving within several hundred million years of the planet’s violent, fiery birth.
That’s a geologic eyeblink, and one that excites scientists pondering the origins of life and its ubiquity in the cosmos. In particular, icy ocean worlds orbiting Jupiter and Saturn are thought be among the best places to search for life beyond Earth.
“This is certainly very interesting and relevant to the current enthusiasm for missions to Enceladus and Europa,” says NASA’s Chris McKay, who adds that he found the team’s evidence convincing but is reserving final judgment. “Hydrothermal vents are postulated for Europa. For Enceladus, there are quite direct indications of hydrothermal vents.”
Even more intriguing is the story told by the simultaneous existence of these organisms and a completely different type of photosynthetic life-form that created the 3.7-billion-year-old microbial mats, called stromatolites.
Together, those lumps of relic biology in Greenland and the iron filaments in Canada suggest that life was stubborn. It diversified and survived, even as a young Earth spasmed and erupted and was bombarded from above by a hazardous rain of space rocks.
“We may well live in a biological universe,” Hand says, “a universe in which many different trees of life populate worlds near and far, old and young.”
- 2 min
- Nadia Drake
The earliest evidence for life on Earth includes: 3.8 billion-year-old biogenic hematite in a banded iron formation of the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt in Canada; [30] graphite in 3.7 billion-year-old metasedimentary rocks in western Greenland; [31] and microbial mat fossils in 3.48 billion-year-old sandstone in Western Australia.
Aug 31, 2016 · Stromatolite fossils formed around 3,700 million years ago in what is now Greenland predate the previous oldest fossil evidence for life on Earth by more than 200 million years.
Aug 16, 2024 · The earliest fossil evidence we have for life is around 3.4 billion years old. Some studies push back Luca's age close to the birth of Earth, 4.5 billion years ago. Others think this is impossible because of the time it would take to establish the genetic code and DNA replication machinery.
There are even reasons to think a civilization existed over 300 million years ago. There are many past civilizations.
