Search results
People also ask
What is McConnell v FEC?
What is McConnell v Federal Election Commission?
Who ruled in Mitch McConnell v FEC?
What is the Federal Election Commission v McCain-Feingold case?
What challenges were faced by Mitch McConnell?
Can a McConnell plaintiff challenge BCRA 305?
Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), often referred to as the McCain–Feingold Act.
McConnell v. FEC. Summary. Documents. Summary. On December 10, 2003, the Supreme Court issued a ruling upholding the two principal features of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA): the control of soft money and the regulation of electioneering communications.
Sep 8, 2003 · Facts of the case. In early 2002, a many years-long effort by Senators John McCain and Russell Feingold to reform the way that money is raised for--and spent during-- political campaigns culminated in the passage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (the so-called McCain-Feingold bill sometimes referred to as BCRA).
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. McCONNELL, UNITED STATES SENATOR, et al. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. No. 02–1674. Argued September 8, 2003—Decided December 10, 2003.
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 United States Supreme Court case challenging the constitutionality of the "McCain-Feingold" Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), which placed the following restriction on campaigns and contributors:
Dec 10, 2003 · McConnell v. FEC: Full decision (majority opinion and dissents) Date. December 10, 2003. Case. McConnell v. FEC. Court Level. Supreme Court. The lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 - eleven suits brought by more than 80 plaintiffs - were consolidated asMcConnell v. FEC.
Dec 10, 2003 · McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), often referred to as the McCain–Feingold Act.
