Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy.

  3. Apr 13, 2017 · Case summary for Gratz v. Bollinger: Two Caucasians challenged the University of Michigans admissions policy after being denied entry into the undergraduate program, claiming the procedure violated the 14th Amendment ’s Equal Protection clause .

  4. Bollinger decisions, pair of cases addressing the issue of affirmative action in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 23, 2003, that the undergraduate admissions policy of the University of Michigan violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  5. Gratz v. Bollinger: The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a public university from using an undergraduate admissions policy in which race is the sole reason behind awarding 20 percent of the minimum points required for admission.

  6. Mar 28, 2024 · Gratz v. Bollinger. 539 U.S. 244 (2003) Quick Summary. Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher (plaintiffs) challenged the University of Michigan’s admissions policy, which they claimed discriminated against them based on race, favoring underrepresented minority groups.

  7. In October 1997, Gratz and Hamacher filed a class action suit against the University, the LSA, Lee Bollinger, and James Duderstadt. They argued that the admission procedure discriminated against certain racial and ethnic groups in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  8. In Gratz v. Bollinger , Judge Duggan ruled that the grid system under which Jennifer Gratz had been rejected was unconstitutional, but that the points system in place since then was a justified means of attaining a diverse student body.

  1. People also search for