Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Accordingly the Secretary of State accepts that there is a real risk that if Ms. Adan were sent to Germany the German authorities (including the German court), applying the accountability theory, would reject her claim for asylum and send her back to Somalia.

  2. Dec 19, 2000 · It is common ground that if each of the appellants were sent back to the countries from which immediately they came to the United Kingdom, Germany would probably send back Adan to Somalia and France would probably send back Aitseguer to Algeria.

  3. Under the law of the United Kingdom, as decided by this House in Adan v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department, an asylum-seeker is entitled to the protection to Article 33 notwithstanding that the state in whose territory he fears persecution is not complicit in that persecution.

  4. www.statewatch.org › statewatch-database › uk-keyStatewatch

    Sep 1, 1999 · Ms Adan, from Somalia, had her claim for asylum rejected in Germany and subsequently came to the United Kingdom. She was seeking asylum from an armed group who were persecuting her clan. Mr Subaskaran fled via Germany from Sri Lanka, fearing persecution at the hands of the Tamil Tigers.

  5. It is common ground that if each of the appellants were sent back to the countries from which immediately they came to the United Kingdom, Germany would probably send back Adan to Somalia and France would probably send back Aitseguer to Algeria.

  6. Apr 2, 1998 · If Mr Adan were to return to Somalia he would be in danger of his life owing to his membership of one of the warring clans. Mr Blake argues that this amounts to persecution for a Convention reason, of which he has a current well-founded fear.

  7. People also ask

  8. So in British law, the government could not send Ms.Adan back to Germany: Germany would send her back to Somalia otherwise than in accordance with the Geneva Convention.

  1. People also search for