Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Apr 21, 2017 · Human beings can also be what Schiller calls magnificent: they can, through physical or mental prowess, defeat what they fear. The sublime, by contrast, shows humans succumbing to the fearful but not fearing it.

    • Beauty

      “Being a White Man, in short,” writes Said, “was a very...

  2. A block of marble, therefore, although it is and remains lifeless, can nevertheless become living shape through the architect and sculptor; a human being, although he lives and has shape, is far from being on that account a living shape.

  3. May 22, 2020 · For Schiller, an individual is not really free—indeed, not fully a human being—if they are incapable of doing this, which brings us to (3): the capacity to play is a necessary condition of the achievement of human freedom.

    • Samantha Matherne, Nick Riggle
    • 2020
  4. Jan 1, 2023 · Schiller does not so much focus on individual actions or maxims but the moral character: “The human being is not destined to perform individual ethical actions but to be an ethical being” (GD 149; NA XX, 283).

    • Jörg Noller
    • Joerg.Noller@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
  5. Jan 1, 2023 · Schiller links the coexistence of the material impulse and the formal impulse, of sensuality and reason, of passive and active determination, with a genetic representation of the development of the two natures in human beings. Human beings first develop their sensual nature, and only later their rational nature (Schiller, AE, 19th Letter, NA 20 ...

    • violetta.waibel@univie.ac.at
  6. Schiller acknowledges the utopian character of the task. Still, he submits that there are moments in life when feeling and thinking merge, when human beings are able to realize both drives in a complementary way. These are the moments when human beings play.

  7. People also ask

  8. Feb 12, 2019 · Schiller also assumes that it is the purpose of manto educate himself as a human being” (SW 4:750), whereby above all the liberative moral aspects are important. However, how he conceives of history is not so much a straightforward development but more a dialectical model of distinct stages.

  1. People also search for