Search results
Mar 5, 2019 · However, it is my opinion that the completion of a rule 35(3)/rule 32(3) [Delete as appropriate] report in these circumstances will not be appropriate for you.
Consideration of a Rule 35(3) report must take the following approach, which will inform the detention review due. The consideration is different from that due in an asylum decision. The written response must address each element clearly: i. Consider whether the Rule 35 report constitutes independent evidence of torture
- 282KB
- 17
Oct 23, 2024 · It is possible that a person in detention may independently make available to the Home Office information in respect of a rule 35(1) or STHF rule 32(1) or RHR Rule 32 assessment which falls...
- This guidance tells you how to assess whether a person either in immigration detention or being considered for immigration detention is an ‘adult a...
- If you have any questions about the guidance and your line manager or senior caseworker cannot help you, or you think that the guidance has factual...
- Below is information on when this version of the guidance was published: version 9.0 published for Home Office staff on 20 April 2023
- guidance updated to reflect modification of Rule 32 of the Short-Term Holding Facility Rules 2018 for Residential Holding Rooms as amended by the S...
- The information in this guidance applies to all cases in which consideration is being given to detaining an individual in order to remove them. It...
- The decision maker should answer the following questions to inform their decision: does the individual need to be detained in order to effect remov...
- Indicators of whether an individual may be particularly vulnerable to harm, and therefore at risk in detention, include the conditions or experienc...
- Evidence levelsOnce an individual has been identified as being at risk, by virtue of them exhibiting an indicator of risk, consideration should be...
- External medical reportsThe standards covered in the following paragraphs will apply to medical reports commissioned by an immigration advisor, or...
- In all cases in which the detention of an individual is being considered, the decision maker deciding on detention should first assess whether ther...
UK Visas and Immigration guidance for staff working in immigration removal centres and residential short-term holding facilities who are responsible for authorising, managing and reviewing...
• Current pro forma Rule 35(3) report specifically asks doctors to comment on the impact of detention in Section 6 (see DSO 09/2016, Detention centre rule 35 and Short-term Holding Facility rule 32 ).
Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules (2001, No. 238), states that: “The medical practitioner shall report to the manager on the case of any detained person whose health is likely to be injuriously affected by continued detention or any conditions of detention.
People also ask
What is a rule 35 report / Rule 32 report?
What information is included in a report submitted under Rule 35?
What if I receive a DC Rule 35 or sthf Rule 32 report?
Should I complete a rule 35 (3)/Rule 32 (3) [delete as appropriate] report?
What is Rule 35 and why is it important?
Can a doctor submit a rule 35 report?
The failure to complete Rule 35 reports in appropriate circumstances resulted in the deterioration in the mental health of detained people, increased their risk of self-harm and suicide, and therefore left them more vulnerable to harm. Deterioration was not detected or monitored adequately.
