Search results
Jan 15, 2016 · Gambit's are sacrifices which are played hoping to get development advantage and/or initiative in opening. So if you accept the gambit, and if the opponent can't consolidate development advantage and/or initiative, you will end up better.
Apr 6, 2021 · depends on the gambit. as you gain experience you will know what to do against particular gambits. for some, like the Vienna gambit, you lose the game immediately if you accept. In the Danish and Goring Gambits, while accepting is not losing for black, it is best to decline with d5
Nov 1, 2012 · Accepting a gambit. The advantage here of course is that you are gaining a material advantage, which, if you can hold onto it, provides well for your long-term prospects in the game.
Some gambits you absolutely should accept, like the Stafford, and others you absolutely should not, like the Rousseau. And some gambits are better for you to accept, but generally so scary that you shouldn't do so unless you're ready for an insane fight, like the King's Gambit.
May 2, 2024 · “Should I accept or decline the Queen’s Gambit?” is a question that can’t be answered without considering the style and level of your play. If you love control and working from a solid foundation, declining will sync better with your approach.
You can play d5 as black and play the queen's gambit accepted or declined. Eventually, as you get better at chess and understand these openings better through practice, you will understand why the two variations you listed are bad (and hence not the main lines of the opening).
Queens Gambit Accepted is a perfectly legit opening. It's a bit less solid than Queens Gambit Declined (which is probably why many players refrain from it), but if played correctly, it can be more challenging for the opponent.
