Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Feb 9, 2023 · A crossed-lagged panel model revealed continuity in screen time between the ages of 3.5 and 4.5 (ß = 0.68) and temperamental anger/frustration from 3.5 to 4.5 (ß = 0.60). Child screen...

  2. Child screen time at age 3.5 predicted increased proneness to anger/ frustration at age 4.5 (ß=0.14). Anger/frustration at age 3.5 did not predict screen time at age 4.5.

  3. We also consider child sex as a control variable. Results: A crossed-lagged panel model revealed continuity in screen time between the ages of 3.5 and 4.5 (ß = 0.68) and temperamental anger/frustration from 3.5 to 4.5 (ß = 0.60).

  4. Nov 6, 2023 · Our aim is to estimate whether parent strategies for mediating child screen time including restrictive and instructive mediation and social coviewing, predict preschooler adherence to the screen time recommendation of ≤1 h/day during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  5. Anger/frustration at age 3.5 did not predict screen time at age 4.5. Our results suggest that preschooler screen time during the pandemic may have undermined the ability to regulate negative emotions, a key component of social and academic competence.

  6. Feb 9, 2023 · A crossed-lagged panel model revealed continuity in screen time between the ages of 3.5 and 4.5 (ß = 0.68) and temperamental anger/frustration from 3.5 to 4.5 (ß = 0.60). Child screen time at age 3.5 predicted increased proneness to anger/frustration at age 4.5 (ß = 0.14). Anger/frustration at age 3.5 did not predict screen time at age 4.5.

  7. People also ask

  8. Feb 9, 2023 · Evidence is provided that preschool screen time at age 3.5 prospectively contributes to the tendency to react in anger/frustration at age 4.5, suggesting that preschooler screen time during the COVID-19 pandemic may have undermined the ability to regulate negative emotions.

  1. People also search for