Search results
Feb 10, 2006 · Coercion, he says, is a kind of necessity in which the activities of one agent — the coercer — make something necessary for another agent. The “necessity of coercion” is that in which “a thing must be, when someone is forced by some agent, so that he is not able to do the contrary” (ibid.).
On the other face, it picks out a kind of reason for why agents (coercees) sometimes do or refrain from doing something. Coercion is typically thought to carry with it several important implications, including that it diminishes the targeted agent's freedom and responsibility, and that it is a (pro tanto) wrong and/or violation of right ...
What is needed is a morally neutral account erced into performing A, then Q is not. of coercion. Second, the moralized view properly regarded as responsible for A. Let. is unable to account for the prima facie us call this the contingent view of moral wrongness of coercion. Coercion is prima responsibility.
Coercion involves compelling a party to act in an involuntary manner by the use of threats, including threats to use force against that party. [1][2][need quotation to verify][3] It involves a set of forceful actions which violate the free will of an individual in order to induce a desired response. These actions may include extortion ...
Governments use coercion in order to maintain law and order; the penal system is a system of threats and inducements. But if state coercion is justified, then coercion cannot always be wrong. One reason why acts of coercion may seem wrong is that they limit somebody’s freedom. However, as evidenced by the penal system, state coercion limits ...
Jul 3, 2020 · However, coercion, not unlike law, is itself a complex philosophical phenomenon with a deep bench of literature devoted to it. Consider the following scenario: A would-be robber approaches a man from behind, holds a gun to the man’s head and says, “Give me your wallet and I won’t pull the trigger.”
People also ask
What does coercion mean?
Does coercion affect responsibility?
Is coercion a crime?
Is coercion a violation of right?
How does coercion work?
How does the law use coercion?
coercion by definition violates (say) the victim's rights, we fail to understand social interaction which looks like coercion but is, nevertheless, legitimate. If I use my gun and force a robber to leave my house, am I not coercing him? Secondly, I shall tackle the difficult prob-lem of justifying some instances of coercion
