Search results
Nov 13, 2011 · Is anything really taboo, or are things just inadvisable, problematic, unhealthy, unwise, and less than optimal under the circumstances? John and Ken consider what, if anything, is still sacred with Cora Diamond from the University of Virginia, author of The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind.
Nov 12, 2011 · Today we're asking the question: Is Nothing Sacred Anymore? Holding something sacred is often associated with religion and God. Some things are held to be sacred because of their relation to God’s wishes and commands.
Oct 25, 2017 · Nothing is sacred anymore because things have been deprived of their mystery. To those who hate the sacred, the mere existence of mystery affirms an unknowable and superior truth that is not recognized by modern science.
Jan 1, 2002 · This book's author is best known for developing a non-realistic interpretation of Christian doctrine and an ever-more radically antirealist position in philosophy.
- Don Cupitt
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B., & Wojcik, S. P. (2012). Is anything sacred anymore? Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 155–161. https:// https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.669248. Abstract. Comments on an article by Kurt Gray, Liane Young and Adam Waytz (see record 2012-14742-001). The central thesis of the author’s article is both elegant in ...
IS ANYTHING SACRED ANYMORE? 'sacred'. The sacred is of course at the core of all the great world religions, and is, by definition, ineffable. However, it may be help ful to unpack some of the elements or 'ingredients' associated with the term itself. Anthropologists of Religion such as Rudolf Otto wrote that the sacred engages the affective ...
People also ask
Is everything sacred?
What if something is sacred?
What is 'Nothing Sacred'?
Is Nothing Sacred a good book?
What is considered sacred and what is not?
Why do people hold things sacred?
For our pur- sequences (i.e., ends justify means) or whether acts poses, what is crucial about Gray et al.'s dyadic moral- can be wrong in and of themselves (i.e., ends can- ity approach is that it seems to imply that interpersonal not justify some means).
