Yahoo Web Search

Search results

    • Villain

      • Richard III, as portrayed in Shakespeare’s famous historical play, was most certainly a villain, scheming and monologuing his way to a well-deserved and painful end.
      themercury.com/features/books_and_writing/richard-iii-hero-or-villain-he-was-somewhere-in-between/article_b6fee3f8-024d-5c0f-8696-7ac8be347639.html
  1. People also ask

  2. For over 500 years Richard’s name was dragged through the mud, thanks mostly to Shakespeare’s play Richard III. His portrayal in the play as a villainous, scheming and murderous hunchback set the tone for how history would remember him. But how true was the great playwright’s depiction of the monarch who ruled for a mere 777 days?

  3. Richard III was the last Plantagenet king, whose defeat in 1485 at the Battle of Bosworth against the man who would become Henry VII marked the beginning of the Tudor dynasty. But how did a man...

    • Tracey Sinclair
  4. Apr 29, 2024 · As Richard massacres his way through his kin, the sprawling historical storytelling that Shakespeare had presented in the Henry VI plays takes on a much tauter dimension. His Richard is a villain whose downfall is brought about by Richmond, later Henry VII, the founder of the Tudor dynasty.

  5. Oct 7, 2020 · Of course, the monarch on the throne when Shakespeare wrote Richard III, Queen Elizabeth I, was the granddaughter of Henry VII, the king who had initiated the Tudor dynasty. Elizabeth, childless and in her late fifties when Richard III was first staged, would be the last of the Tudor line.

  6. ‘Child killer’, ‘murderer’, ‘usurper’ are all phrases you would associate with Shakespeare’s greatest villain - Richard III. Thanks largely due to the Shakespearian portrayal, Richard has gone down in history as one of England’s most evil monarchs.

  7. Mar 11, 2021 · Richard III (1452–85) was the last Yorkist king of England, whose death at the battle of Bosworth in 1485 signified the end of the Wars of the Roses and marked the start of the Tudor age.

  8. Given how charismatically awful Shakespeare made his deformed anti-hero, it is sad to have to admit how comparatively nice the real Richard III really was. Whatever Shakespeare’s play may say, Richard was not born with teeth, and he did not have an especially crooked back.