Search results
- Short, scrappy and intermittently scary, this sequel skews young. It lacks the scale, the chills and the wonder of the original, but is more fun as a thrill ride than its sequel predecessor - and certainly gives good pterodactyl.
www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/jurassic-park-3-review/
People also ask
Is Jurassic Park III worth watching?
Is there a Jurassic Park 3 without a human villain?
Is Jurassic Park 3 the same as jp-3?
Is Jurassic Park a good movie?
Which Jurassic Park movies were released in June?
Which is better Jurassic Park 3 or Lost World?
May 27, 2022 · Released in 2001 and directed by Joe Johnston, Jurassic Park III is a mostly forgotten film. The critical response was middling to average; it did well at the box office but was easily the...
- Germain Lussier
- Is: Forgettable Characters
- Isn't: Great Effects
- Is: Rehashed Ideas
- Isn't: Plenty of Dino Action
- Is: A Low Stakes Story
- Isn't: A Linear Adventure
- Is: An Unsatisfying Finale
- Isn't: A Quick Pace
- Is: A Waste of Laura Dern
- Isn't: Sam Neill Is Still A Great Lead
This isn't to say that Jurassic Park III doesn't have a cast of great actors but the movie's characters never really seem worthy of them. Alan Grant was one of the best things about the original movie but quite consciously not the charismatic force of Jeff Goldblum's Ian Malcolm, who could carry his sequel a bit more easily. Jurassic Park III remai...
Whether they be practical or digital, the Jurassic Park franchise is famous for wowing audiences with its effects and Jurassic Park III definitely puts in the work in this department. Both the digital and animatronic versions of the dinosaurs alone are enough to sell the movie really and the sequences stay in the realm of real-life stunts and sets ...
Alan Grant stagnates quite a lot in the time spent in between the events of the original movie and Jurassic Park III, meaning that he's pretty much in the same situation he was in at the beginning fo the first movie (only slightly worse off) and the motivation behind his character is stuck in the past therefore also. With Alan being the only repres...
There are plenty of great qualities to a Jurassic Park movie but, if we're all being completely honest with ourselves, the audience is showing up for the dinosaur action and Jurassic Park III delivers on this front. RELATED: The 10 Grisliest Deaths In The Jurassic Park Franchise Aside from introducing more types of dinosaurs, the slimmed-down plot ...
Aside from feeling rehashed and underdeveloped, the stakes at play in Jurassic Park III's story feel shockingly low for the franchise or just an action/adventure/thriller movie in general. Alan Grant's motivation for returning to the danger of the islands is once again mostly monetary with a tinge of fascination but, other than his survival, the st...
The benefit to the lack of complexity in Jurassic Park III's story is that it's never even in danger of getting bogged down in subplots or needlessly complicated plans. With the normality of huge superhero narratives in blockbusters today, it's kind of a welcomed blast from the past to see a high-budget, well-made, franchise action movie that gets ...
So much of what works about Jurassic Park III would feel so much more memorable and complete if it only built to a satisfying conclusion of some kind. RELATED: Jurassic Park: 5 Things The Franchise Got Right About Dinosaurs (& 5 Things It Got Wrong) It was almost certainly a result of the screenplay's numerous rewrites, and there are many stories s...
It's certainly not encouraging when one of the nicest things you have to say about something is that it's over relatively quickly but Jurassic Park III offers fans a comparatively easygoing and self-contained chapter in the franchise's history. If you love the original movie, and want something slightly different but still overwhelmingly similar, t...
Laura Dern's performance as Dr. Ellie Sattler was one of the best seen in a blockbuster movie from the 1990sand to see her not only return in the movie to reinforce that she and Alan Grant were no longer together but effectively only fill the role of an extended cameo felt disheartening for fans, to say the least. Her egregious sidelining in the mo...
Despite the story not having much new material for Dr. Alan Grant to do, he's still a great, and humorous, protagonist to spend a movie with. He's not quite fully mature himself so his role as a babysitter to even more immature characters is a dynamic that still works and it allows him to shine as a hero who's able to convincingly use brains over b...
- Mark Birrell
Apr 14, 2020 · Hasn't Aged Well: Silly Decisions By The Characters. Audiences have gotten quicker over the years in picking out nonsensical elements from films, and Jurassic Park III suffers by hoping the viewers adopt a very simple mindset. However, watching the characters make dumb decisions does become very tiresome.
Jan 27, 2024 · Jurassic Park III was once deemed the weakest installment of the original trilogy, but it's now being reevaluated and praised as a fun, albeit forgettable, monster movie. The movie's mediocrity stemmed from it being a retread of The Lost World: Jurassic Park and it lacked the originality that made the first two films successful.
Jan 5, 2021 · Jurassic Park 3 actually has more animatronics than The Lost World, and they’re pretty good in this one. Plus, since most of the movie takes place in day time, we get to see the monsters in...
- Rich Knight
Apr 8, 2021 · This week, Coy and Perri welcome Rotten Tomatoes editor-in-chief Joel Meares to explain why Jurassic Park III is actually a good movie and worthy installment of the franchise.
Jurassic Park III is a 2001 American science fiction action film [3] directed by Joe Johnston and written by Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne, and Jim Taylor. It is the third installment in the Jurassic Park franchise and the final film in the original Jurassic Park trilogy, following The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997).
