Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. plato.stanford.edu › entries › liberty-positive-negativePositive and Negative Liberty - Stanford Encyclopedia of ...

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › liberty-positive-negative

   Feb 27, 2003 · While theorists of negative freedom are primarily interested in the degree to which individuals or groups suffer interference from external bodies, theorists of positive freedom are more attentive to the internal factors affecting the degree to which individuals or groups act autonomously.

   • Freedom: of Speech

     In the philosophical literature, the terms “freedom of...

   • Berlin, Isaiah

     Negative liberty Berlin initially defined as freedom from,...

   • Rights

     1. Categories of Rights A right to life, a right to choose;...

   • Autonomy: Personal

     An agent need not sacrifice her autonomy in order to decide...

   • Limits of Law

     Legal Moralism is often formulated in terms of immorality as...

   • Abilities

     1. A taxonomy. What is an ability? On one reading, this...

2. media.philosophy.ox.ac.uk › assets › pdf_fileKANT’S CONCEPT OF FREEDOM in the Critique of Pure Reason

   media.philosophy.ox.ac.uk › assets › pdf_file

   In the Critique of Pure Reason, especially in the Third Antinomy, Kant offers arguments for a solution to the problem of freedom and necessity which seem to do justice to the claims of libertarianism and determinism. My restricted aim in this short book is to decide whether any of them is sound.

   • File Size: 322KB

   • Page Count: 66

3. Videos

   • 

     brilliantio.com

     Why Freedom Is Important (Fully Explained)

     27 Apr 2022

   • 

     0:19

     facebook.com

     This concern with the basic condition of freedom — the absence of physical constraint — is unquestionably necessary, but is not all that is necessary. It is perfectly possible for a man to be out of prison and yet not free — to be under no physical constraint and yet to be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national State, or of some private interest within the nation, want him to think, feel and act. ~ Aldous Huxley | Found Conscious

     9 Dec 2022

     8.5K views

   • 

     0:15

     youtube.com

     Freedom is being self Sufficient, Trim your own home grown

     2 Oct 2024

     466 views

   View all

4. fee.org › articles › individualism-and-freedom-vitalIndividualism and Freedom: Vital Pillars of True Communities

   fee.org › articles › individualism-and-freedom-vital

   • Cached

   Jan 1, 1998 · It follows that freedom is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for happiness. Individual happiness can be defined as the positive conscious emotional experience that accompanies or derives from the use of one’s human potentialities, including one’s talents, capabilities, and virtues.

5. www.cambridge.org › core › booksThe Conditions of Human Freedom (Chapter 7) - Morality and ...

   www.cambridge.org › core › books

   • Cached

   Jun 9, 2021 · How then can our thought and action be free in responding to the reasons there are and yet at the same time be shaped by the causal order of nature? The problem has to do with how reasons (not simply our ideas of reasons) can be causes, and this chapter explains how it is possible.

6. www.jstor.org › stable › 25749186Four Conceptions of Freedom - JSTOR

   www.jstor.org › stable › 25749186

   ond condition characterized in three alternative ways: (1) no dependence, (2) no interference, or (3) achievement of self-realization. Though Skinner clearly intends to systematize accounts of civil liberty, none of the three. conditions actually requires the existence of a political association.

7. academic.oup.com › book › 44777 The Content of Justice: Freedom and Equality - Oxford Academic

   academic.oup.com › book › 4477

   • Cached

   Dec 22, 2011 · From a social point of view, she/he must be reasonably free from others’ interference. By focusing on the social determinants of autonomy only, freedom is a necessary (but not a sufficient) condition for persons to live autonomously.

8. People also ask

   Is Freedom a necessary condition for a person to live autonomously?

   • From a social point of view, she/he must be reasonably free from others’ interference. By focusing on the social determinants of autonomy only, freedom is a necessary (but not a sufficient) condition for persons to live autonomously.

   7 The Content of Justice: Freedom and Equality - Oxford Academic

   academic.oup.com/book/4477/chapter/146528200

   See all results for this question

   Is freedom a necessary condition for happiness?

   • Freedom is a necessary condition for happiness, according to the passage. Individual happiness is defined as the positive conscious emotional experience that accompanies or derives from the use of one’s human potentialities, including one’s talents, capabilities, and virtues.

   Individualism and Freedom: Vital Pillars of True Communities

   fee.org/articles/individualism-and-freedom-vital-pillars-of-true-communities/

   See all results for this question

   Can a two-aspect solution to the problem of freedom be circumvented?

   • Irwin has pointed to a problem which appears fatal to the two-aspect solution to the problem of freedom. However, this problem can be circumvented. It requires giving up the assumption that agents or actions are determined on the Kantian view. Of course this invites the objection: They are determined.

   KANT’S CONCEPT OF FREEDOM in the Critique of Pure Reason

   media.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/assets/pdf_file/0015/1374/Kants_Concept.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Is Freedom a freedom?

   • From the perspective of freedom as independence, it is not. In particular, those who owe their freedom simply to the benign attitude of the powerful are less free than those who are secured against the powerful’s intervention. The former’s choices are still ultimately dependent on the will of their superiors, but the latter’s choices are not.

   7 The Content of Justice: Freedom and Equality - Oxford Academic

   academic.oup.com/book/4477/chapter/146528200

   See all results for this question

   Is there only one basic concept of freedom?

   • In an influential article, the American legal philosopher Gerald MacCallum (1967) put forward the following answer: there is in fact only one basic concept of freedom, on which both sides in the debate converge. What the so-called negative and positive theorists disagree about is how this single concept of freedom should be interpreted.

   Positive and Negative Liberty - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/

   See all results for this question

   Is Freedom a kind of causality?

   • Bennett notes correctly that Kant is discussing two putatively distinct forms of causality, one that operates in accordance with natural law, and one that allegedly operates freely, and is thus not constrained by natural law. This is what is right about Bennett’s reading: that freedom is a kind of causality.

   KANT’S CONCEPT OF FREEDOM in the Critique of Pure Reason

   media.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/assets/pdf_file/0015/1374/Kants_Concept.pdf

   See all results for this question

9. www.jstor.org › stable › pdfProfessor Ayer's 'Freedom and Necessity' - JSTOR

   www.jstor.org › stable › pdf

   cause or causes in the form of a sufficient condition, which prevents either the making of a decision or the putting of it into effect. Nor is the situation in respect of causality essentially different in