Search results
Nov 17, 2018 · Engelhardt is correct in his observations about secularization, and his perceptions are confirmed by a recent report 1 that stated that in the year 2000, approximately 79.2% of Italians declared themselves to be Roman Catholic, whereas in 2016, only 60.1% do so (Marini, 2017). As a consequence, in the past 5 years, 55 parishes have been closed ...
- Mori, Maurizio
Nov 17, 2018 · Engelhardt is correct in his observations about secularization, and his perceptions are confirmed by a recent report which stated that in the year 2000 approximately 79.2% of Italians declared themselves to be Roman Catholic, while now (in 2016) only 60.1% do so.
- Mark J Cherry
- 2018
Jun 8, 2017 · In essence, Engelhardt claims simply that Western culture has followed a path, not inevitably but not accidentally, toward a form of secularization that makes general moral discourse meaningless. He offers a non-Western alternative of Christian spirituality and moral engagement, if not for the broader society, at least amongst health care ...
- James R. Thobaben
- 2017
Dec 29, 2015 · At the end, I examine Engelhardt’s arguments concerning the futility of attempts at justifying a content-full secular bioethics, and indicate how these assumptions have shaped Engelhardt’s critique of the alternatives for the possibility of secular bioethics.
- Shahram Ahmadi Nasab Emran
- sahmadin@slu.edu
- 2016
Here we have a conjunction of the two levels of Engelhardt’s criticisms: secularization modified, in depth, the nature of morality itself, and the conclusion was a change of moral norms so that the content of morality is different, and sometimes opposite.
- Maurizio Mori
Dec 31, 2018 · In particular, Engelhardt is doubtful that a morality after God is possible, while I argue that it is going to be produced and possibly will be more adequate than traditional morality.
People also ask
Is Engelhardt correct about secularization?
Can a secular morality be a canonical or a common morality?
How does Engelhardt conclude after God?
What does Engelhardt say about bioethics?
What are secular norms?
Does Engelhardt undermine purely rationalistic ethics?
Engelhardt explains this comment in a footnote by saying that the human species is as it is only due to chance mutations, natural catastrophes and the like. Furthermore, given the potential of genetic engineering, species boundaries could become hazy.
