Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Karl Marx and the Critique of Bourgeois Philosophy

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   Aug 30, 2023 · Abstract. Marx investigated the bourgeois mindset shared by modern philosophy and economics. From Hegel, Marx inherits the importance of action and critique of Verstand, the predominant modern thinking that traces back to Hellenism. Purism and bifurcation make up the bourgeois mindset.

2. www.marxists.org › archive › mattick-paulMarxism and Bourgeois Economics by Paul Mattick

   www.marxists.org › archive › mattick-paul

   • Cached

   Just as the proletariat opposed the bourgeoisie, so Marx confronted bourgeois economic theory: not in order to develop it, or to improve it, but to destroy its apparent validity and, finally, with the abolition of capitalism, to overcome it altogether.

3. www.marxists.org › bourgeois-economics › ch02Marxism and Bourgeois Economics by Paul Mattick

   www.marxists.org › bourgeois-economics › ch02

   • Cached

   The Transformation Problem. At this point we might as well interrupt our outline of Marx’s critique of political economy and attend to the so-called transformation problem, which agitated academic Marxism from time to time and only recently flared up again with special vehemence.

4. www.cambridge.org › core › journalsMarxism of, by, and for the People: Karl Korsch and the ...

   www.cambridge.org › core › journals

   • Cached

   Demonstrating how bourgeois ideas, despite their universalistic pretentions, were rooted in and in turn secured the economic position of the bourgeoisie, Marx showed that challenging them was an essential part of the revolutionary struggle.

5. link.springer.com › referenceworkentry › 10Marx and Philosophy of Education | SpringerLink

   link.springer.com › referenceworkentry › 10

   • Cached

   Jan 1, 2016 · The Soviet Union as was and the Republic of China are two examples of how Marx’s critique of bourgeois economies and social relations were transformed, in different ways, into general programmes of compulsory “state” education which aimed at advancing new forms of social relations and new societies.

   • Author: Nigel Tubbs

   • Email: Nigel.Tubbs@winchester.ac.uk

6. libcom.org › library › economic-crisis-and-crisisChapter 1: Bourgeois Economics - libcom.org

   libcom.org › library › economic-crisis-and-crisis

   • Cached

   Jul 28, 2005 · The Marxian critique of bourgeois economics was therefore a double one. On the one hand, it consisted ii) the rigorous application of the labor theory of value to the study of capitalist development, which it analyzed in terms of the system's own fetishistic economic categories.

7. People also ask

   How was Marx's critique of bourgeois economies transformed into a'state' education?

   • The Soviet Union as was and the Republic of China are two examples of how Marx’s critique of bourgeois economies and social relations were transformed, in different ways, into general programmes of compulsory “state” education which aimed at advancing new forms of social relations and new societies.

   Marx and Philosophy of Education | SpringerLink

   link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_343-1

   See all results for this question

   Why did Karl Marx confront bourgeois economic theory?

   • Just as the proletariat opposed the bourgeoisie, so Marx confronted bourgeois economic theory: not in order to develop it, or to improve it, but to destroy its apparent validity and, finally, with the abolition of capitalism, to overcome it altogether.

   Marxism and Bourgeois Economics by Paul Mattick

   www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1983/bourgeois-economics/introduction.htm

   See all results for this question

   What was bourgeois economic theory?

   • With regard to the past, it was true of course that bourgeois economic theory was the expression of the bourgeoisie’s own class struggle within and against feudal society, and to that extent was able to see in the development of production and the productivity of labor the vehicle for social change and the basis of capital accumulation.

   Marxism and Bourgeois Economics by Paul Mattick

   www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1983/bourgeois-economics/introduction.htm

   See all results for this question

   Is Marxism a challenge to the bourgeois social sciences?

   • Especially Marxism, or “scientific socialism,” was a challenge to the bourgeois social sciences and had to be met on theoretical grounds. This interest, to be sure, was not an overwhelming one, but an inescapable acknowledgement of the existence of Marxism, which remained a side-issue, but an issue nonetheless.

   Marxism and Bourgeois Economics by Paul Mattick

   www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1983/bourgeois-economics/ch02.htm

   See all results for this question

   How was Marxism applied to education in the west?

   • Another way in which Marxism was applied to education in the West was as a theoretical perspective with its own concepts and frameworks by which the theory and practice of education in capitalist societies could be understood. Marxist perspectives of this kind were prevalent in philosophy, sociology, politics, and economics.

   Marx and Philosophy of Education | SpringerLink

   link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_343-1

   See all results for this question

   How does Marx's critique differ from bourgeois philosophy?

   • But the double-sidedness at the core of Marx’s critique differs from the familiar dualisms of bourgeois philosophy. This is not a dualism founded on a purist opposition, where one entity excludes the other. The duality of use-value and exchange-value is unstable because the elements cannot be separated.

   Karl Marx and the Critique of Bourgeois Philosophy

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-37545-3_5

   See all results for this question

8. www.cambridge.org › core › journalsMarx and Weber on Liberalism as Bourgeois Ideology

   www.cambridge.org › core › journals

   More than that, we are told repeatedly that his ‘sociological perspective is broader than the reductionist economic focus of Marx's’. Weber is hailed as the ‘main architect of what is perhaps the most important alternative to the strict or loose Marxist type of emphasis’.