Search results
Jun 1, 2023 · What kind of systematic review should i conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
Jan 4, 2019 · This guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information. We outline core standards and principles and describe commonly encountered problems.
- Andy P. Siddaway, Alex M. Wood, Larry V. Hedges
- 2019
Key Points: Systematic reviews address a need for health decision makers to be able to access high quality, relevant, accessible and up-to-date information. Systematic reviews aim to minimize bias through the use of pre-specified research questions and methods that are documented in protocols, and by basing their findings on reliable research.
Jul 6, 2021 · A systematic review collects secondary data, and is a synthesis of all available, relevant evidence which brings together all existing primary studies for review (Cochrane 2016). A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.
- Veronica Phillips, Eleanor Barker
- 2021
Oct 24, 2024 · The planning stage of a systematic review is essential in avoiding the 5 most common mistakes in conducting systematic reviews and increasing the likelihood of future publication. The steps outlined on this page are often conducted concurrently.
Nov 17, 2017 · A systematic review should be prompted by an interest in a topic, and a wish to answer a specific question. The question should clarify the problem to be addressed, specifying the particular population to which the question applies, as well as any intervention and outcomes of interest.
In making treatment decisions, the highest quality of evidence should be sought, but well-conducted systematic reviews may not always be available. This article provides a concise overview of the steps in a systematic review, with a focus on systematic reviews of RCTs.
