Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Gate two submissions and final decisions. The decisions at gate two are made by further examining the solutions in more detail, with focus on ensuring that funding for continued investigation and development of solutions is aligned to water resources planning. We welcome representations from stakeholders regarding these elements.

    • How are decisions made at Gate 2?1
    • How are decisions made at Gate 2?2
    • How are decisions made at Gate 2?3
    • How are decisions made at Gate 2?4
    • How are decisions made at Gate 2?5
  2. Delivery of these solutions is subject to a formal gated process where decisions are made on delivery penalties and solution funding progression. The details of gate allowances, activities at each gate and delivery incentives are described in more detail in the document 'PR19 final determinations: Strategic regional water resource solutions.'

  3. by gate two, solution teams should consult with their RAPID engagement leads, if it thought this applies to their solution. Appendix A provides a list of relevant existing guidance, which is referenced throughout the document. 2. Gate Two Assessment 2.1 Gate Two Timeline Activity Date Submissions to RAPID By 6pm 14 November 2022

  4. Figure 1 - Solutions considered in the Gate 2 submissionThree options (B.1, B.3 and D.1) have been discontinued between Gate 1 and Gate 2, and one water recycling option (i.e. the original B.4 option) has been. hown to over supply the required Deployable Output (DO). The plant capaci.

  5. December 2021 and concluded that further funding should be allowed for T2ST to progress to Gate 2. This Gate 2 Concept Design Report (CDR) details the development of the T2ST solution since completion of Gate 1 in July 2021. Gate 2 Option Appraisal Following commencement of the Gate 2 assessment for T2ST in August 2021 an options appraisal was

  6. 2.3 The gate one submission to RAPID presented the approach and work completed and was reflected in the good feedback presented in RAPID’s draft decision on the gate one submission2 published on 14 September 2021, alongside the draft decisions for the other standard SROs. The draft decision determined that good progress had been made on all

  7. People also ask

  8. 2.1.1 At Gate 1, the planning consent strategy was summarised as: “For the T2ST raw water transfer options at 80Ml/d and 120Ml/d, provided the DO equates to 80 Ml/d DYAA in a 1 in 200 year drought, these options would automatically be an NSIP, and require an application for Development Consent.

  1. People also search for