Search results
In an effort to exhort the Corinthian Christians toward a greater level of concern for one another in their use of “spiritual gifts,” Paul wrote this admonition. “If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am become a sounding brass, or a clanging cymbal” (1 Cor. 13:1). If it can be established that the term ...
Jan 4, 2022 · First, we should point out that the expression “heavenly language” is nowhere found in Scripture. Also, the phrase “tongues of angels” is used only once, in 1 Corinthians 13:1, “If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.”. Some have suggested that Paul’s ...
Feb 11, 2021 · So when the Holy Spirit moves Paul he speaks in a tongue that he himself doesn't even understands, while in the tongue of men requires interpreters that understands the tongue spoken. 1 Cor 14:27 is the same as in 14:21 In the Law it is written, “By people of strange tongues and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people” it's talking of languages, also in Acts 2:4, 6-11 it's ...
- Tongues Speaking in The Book of Acts Indicates Known Languages
- The People Heard The Disciples Speak in Their Own Language Or Dialect
- This Was A Miracle
- Jews from Different Nations Were Present
- The People Understood What The Disciples Were Saying
- The Content of Their Speech Was God’s Great Works
- Acts 10 Does Not Reveal The Nature of The Languages Spoken
- God Would Not Have His People Speak in Meaningless Sounds
- Ecstatic Speech Predates Christianity
The first recorded episode of tongue-speaking was on the Day of Pentecost. In obedience to the words of Jesus, the disciples waited in Jerusalem for the promise of God the Father. The Book of Acts states the following. They were commanded not to leave the city of Jerusalem until the Holy Spirit came upon them in a unique way. On the Day of Pentecos...
First, the Greek word heteros, translated “other” in verse 4, means “different” tongues or “different” languages. Acts 2:4 says they spoke with “other” tongues. However in Acts 2:6it says that each heard in his own “language.” Therefore the words “other tongues” in verse 4 refers to the dialects or languages of verse six. This makes it clear that t...
Second, the disciples spoke in languages in which they had not previously learned. These languages were unknown to them. Consequently what took place here was something which was entirely supernatural.
In addition, there were Jews present from every a number of different nations. They had come to Jerusalem to celebrate the Feast of Weeks, of Pentecost. This took place fifty days after the Passover. In other words, it was a gathering of Jews from across the Roman Empire who spoke many different languages and dialects.
Next, the Scripture is clear that the people understood what the disciples spoke in their own unique language or dialect. Indeed, they had no trouble understanding what the disciples were saying even though the disciples themselves could not understand the words they were uttering.
Finally, the content of the languages spoken were the wonderful works of God. In other words, they were testifying to the goodness and greatness of God. In sum, on the Day of Pentecost the disciples of Jesus spoke in a number of different languages and dialects of the Roman Empire – languages they had not previously learned. The miracle was that th...
Other occasions in the Book of Acts do not reveal whether the tongues that were used were known earthly languages, ecstatic utterances or some heavenly language. But the indication is that they were known languages. The evidence is as follows. When the gospel went to the Gentiles at the house of Cornelius, Scripture indicates that the tongues were ...
There are also other arguments that favor the tongues in Scripture as actual languages. For one thing, God would not have His people speaking meaningless words. It does not seem consistent with the character of God to have His people using words and phrases that have no apparent meaning. While pagan religions spoke nonsensical ecstatic utterances, ...
There is also the fact that ecstatic utterances, in a religious context, are not uniquely Christian. Accounts of tongue speaking among pagans go back to over 1,000 years before the time of Jesus Christ. The mystery religions of the Roman Empire, which flourished around the time of Christ, also practiced ecstatic speaking. Therefore, the fact that t...
3. 1 Corinthians 13:1 Tongues of men or angels meaning? Eloquence was something greatly admired in the first century and the people of Corinth were no exception. Paul did not offer eloquence in his oratory and writings (cf. 1 Corinthians 2:1, 4; 2 Corinthians 10:10). This may possibly explain the Corinthians' fascination with tongues.
Jul 30, 2024 · 237. 80. “All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other languages, as the Spirit gave them ability.” —Acts 2:4. SPEAKING IN TONGUES IN THE BIBLE. This Armenian manuscript was illustrated by Zakaria Gnunetsi in 1575. It depicts Acts 2 when Jesus’ disciples receive the gift of speaking in tongues at Pentecost.
People also ask
Does Paul say 'tongues of Angels'?
What does it mean to speak in tongues of Angels?
Is “tongues of Angels” a heavenly language?
Are tongues mentioned in the Bible?
How did Paul compare speaking in tongues to a prophecy?
What does the Bible say about speaking in tongues?
1 Corinthians 13:1. ESV If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. NIV If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. NASB If I speak with the tongues of mankind and of angels, but do not have love, I have ...
