Search results
Dec 3, 2021 · To better understand Kaufman’s model, it’s helpful to start by noting the differences between the Kirkpatrick Model and Kaufman’s work. There are three main differences: Kaufman divided Kirkpatrick’s Level 1 into “Input” and “Process.”
Kaufman also replaces Kirkpatrick’s measure of learner satisfaction with the learning experience, looking directly at learning resources and delivery. It’s helpful that Kaufman recognizes that, while input from learners is important when evaluating these elements, it’s not the only source of data.
Aug 31, 2024 · The Kirkpatrick Model is a widely used framework for evaluating the impact of training initiatives on employees’ performance and behavior. This model consists of four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results.
Apr 30, 2020 · The Brinkerhoff model. 6. Kaufman's Model of Learning Evaluation. 7. Anderson Model of Learning Evaluation. 1. What are training evaluation models? Training evaluation models are systematic frameworks for investigating and analyzing the effectiveness of training or learning journeys.
Jan 20, 2016 · Kaufman’s model of learning evaluation is one of those. He makes two significant changes from Kirkpatrick: Kaufman splits Kirkpatrick’s level 1 into “input” and “process”. Input is the learning materials and resources available to learners.
- Andrew Downes
One alternative to Kirkpatrick's four levels is the CIPP model, which stands for context, input, process, and product.
People also ask
Does Kaufman replace Kirkpatrick?
Is Kaufman's model better than Kirkpatrick's?
What is Kirkpatrick's model?
Does the Kirkpatrick Model discourage learning?
Mar 25, 2015 · To address your concerns: 1) Kirkpatrick is essentially orthogonal to the remembering process. It’s not about learning, it’s about aligning learning to impact. 2) I also think that Kirkpatrick doesn’t push us away from learning, though it isn’t exclusive to learning (despite everyday usage).
