Search results
Jul 15, 2011 · Every student of American history knows them. And every lover of liberty has heard them and known that they speak to that great truth about the constitution of civilized government–that we empower governments to protect us in a devil’s bargain from which we will lose in the long run. Continue reading Benjamin Wittes at Lawfare…
- Benjamin Wittes
Benjamin Wittes is a senior fellow in governance studies at...
- Benjamin Wittes
Mar 2, 2015 · Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." That quote often comes up in the context of...
Quick answer: Benjamin Franklin's quote warns against sacrificing freedom for security, suggesting that those who do so deserve neither. He believed liberty requires active...
Feb 14, 2014 · In 1851, in a History of All Nations, the author wrote it in more of the modern form, “they who can give up liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” It...
Jul 20, 2024 · Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither. Those who would trade in their freedom for their protection deserve neither.
‘They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.’ As to the other two acts, (i.e. 16. The American admiralty courts reduced to the same powers they have in England, and the acts establishing them to be reënacted in America; and 17.
People also ask
What is the relationship between liberty and security?
Do people who give up liberty for security deserve neither?
What if we restrict liberty to attain security?
Do people who trade freedom for security deserve liberty or security?
What did Benjamin Franklin say about government surveillance?
Do people who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither?
Jul 15, 2011 · In short, Franklin was not describing some tension between government power and individual liberty. He was describing, rather, effective self-government in the service of security as the very liberty it would be contemptible to trade.
