Search results
Jun 1, 2007 · This suggests that contingency learning is inherently implicit, which contradicts traditional interpretations of contingency effects that assume conscious strategy (e.g., standard accounts of the proportion-congruent effect).
- James R. Schmidt, Matthew J.C. Crump, Jim Cheesman, Derek Besner
- 2007
Jun 1, 2011 · Custers and Aarts (2011) demonstrate that simple contingencies are acquired and represented as a unidirectional association without awareness of the contingency and seemingly, without an intention to learn (henceforth, implicitly).
- Baruch Eitam
- 2011
What Brain Regions Are Engaged by Implicit Learning and How Do They Relate to Language Processing? What This Research Was About and Why It Is Important. IL refers to the process of learning without intention, and even without awareness of what has been learned.
- John N. Williams
- 2020
Implicit learning is, at its core, the process of extracting the covariations among the many stimuli and events in the environment. The system scans promiscuously; when the displays are complex there will be mere co-occurrences among elements, associations that do not actually co-vary.
Jul 1, 2007 · The results of four experiments provide evidence for controlled processing in the absence of awareness. Participants identified the colour of a neutral distracter word. Each of four words...
Dec 22, 2011 · How do humans learn contingencies between events? Both pathway-strengthening and inference-based process models have been proposed to explain contingency learning. We propose that each of these processes is used in different conditions.
People also ask
Did implicit contingency learning occur?
What is implicit learning?
Does awareness affect the size of a contingency effect?
Do contingency-unaware participants learn quickly?
Are all contingency learning tasks associative?
Do associative accounts of contingency learning predict indirect effects?
Two Mechanisms of Human Contingency Learning Understanding how people learn contingencies between events has been a focus of research for many years (Krechevsky, 1932; Pavlov, 1927; Tolman, 1948, 1949). In standard contingency learning tasks, participants view situations in which cues are followed by outcomes,
