Search results
Apr 25, 2024 · The decision said that the trial court “erroneously” allowed women whose allegations against Weinstein were not a part of the charges to testify. The appeals court ordered a new...
Apr 25, 2024 · “We conclude that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes because that...
Apr 25, 2024 · In a 4-3 decision, the New York Court of Appeals said the trial court "erroneously" allowed women to testify against Weinstein despite his not being charged with the alleged sexual acts against...
- Anna Skinner
- 34 sec
Apr 26, 2024 · The New York Appeals Court reached a four-three ruling, stating that Weinstein's 2020 trial had "erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than...
Apr 26, 2024 · The state Court of Appeals overturned Weinstein’s 23-year sentence in a 4-3 decision, saying “the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts” and...
Apr 25, 2024 · “We conclude that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes because that ...
People also ask
Did a trial court 'erroneously' allow women to testify against Weinstein?
Did Weinstein get a fair trial?
Will Weinstein reopen a new trial?
Did a trial court erroneously admit alleged sex crimes?
Was Weinstein's trial an unjust trial?
Why did Weinstein not defend his alleged misbehavior?
Apr 25, 2024 · New York’s highest court on Thursday overturned Harvey Weinstein ’s 2020 rape conviction, finding the judge at the landmark #MeToo trial prejudiced the ex-movie mogul with “egregious” improper...