Search results
The official's son owned firm; county spokesperson says that Registration Chief Ralph Jones Sr. did not violate oath or policy.
At Thursday’s meeting, Barron said that Ralph Jones Sr. had not violated any oath or county policy because his son had made him the registered agent of the company without telling him.
Jul 11, 2018 · Barron said Jones Sr. hadn’t violated his oath or ethical standards. “He didn’t know anything about the articles of inception,” Barron said. “It seems as though Ralph had no knowledge...
May 20, 2015 · He was refused the oath because of his atheism. Asked to be allowed to affirm rather than take Oath of Allegiance. This was refused and he was denied his seat.
- The Injunction “For The Benefit of The Ill”: The Principle of Beneficence
- The Injunction of “No Harm” : The Principle of Non-Maleficence
- Prohibition of Euthanasia Or Absolute Respect For Life?
- Prohibition of Abortion Or Warning Against Harming The Patient?
- Personal Purity and Professional Integrity
- Prohibition of Surgery Or Limitations to Physicians’ Competence?
- Prohibition of Sexual Abuse and Respect of Patient’S Dignity
- Revealing Information About The Patient: Respect of Patient’S Confidentiality
Τhe injunction “for the benefit of the ill” is a recurrent theme that underlies the Oath. It is the so-called Hippocratic Principle, the most emphatic principle in Hippocratic medicine and the originality of the Hippocratic thought [15, pp. 112–126]. This simple axiom is a sober command for a good physician to aim for the obvious objective of his a...
As the injunction “to benefit the ill”represents an ideal that the physician cannot always attain, the oath-taker adds: The imperative of “no harm” is not the first time that appears in the Hippocratic writings. It is found much earlier than the Oath in the clinical, epidemiological treatise Epidemics I: “as to diseases, make a habit of two things,...
Some medical ethicists have understood this passage as the prohibition of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide or even discontinuation of life-sustaining treatment. The concept of prohibition of euthanasia was mainly based on the Pythagorean hypothesis . However, nowhere in the Hippocratic treatises evidence can be found of physicians assisting...
The word “likewise” connects a “deadly drug” with a “destructive pessary”, both of which contradict the most fundamental aim of medicine. In ancient Greek, the keywords in this passage are “pesson fthorion” translated by Littré as “pessaire abortif” and by Edelstein as “abortive remedy” [9, pp. 3–6]. “Pesson fthorion” was not just an ordinary pessa...
The next sentence is inserted, seemingly unrelated, between the previous and the following obligations of the physician. This phrase summarizes the central objective of the Oath, wherein an explicit promise is given “in a pure and holy way”. The two concepts “purity” and “holiness” were significant in most influential Greek healing cults. Their ins...
The pledge never to use the knife is the third highly controversial vow of the Oath. Edelstein believes that “only in connection with Pythagorean medicine this injunction acquires any meaning and plausibility at all” [9, pp. 26–32]. He claims that in order to maintain divine purity Pythagorean medicine forbade “bloody operations” [6, 9, pp. 26–33]....
For the second time, the physician vows “to benefit the ill” and in different words, repeats the early injunction against intentional injustice and harm in relation to the private and personal sphere of the patient and his family. The Oathdistinguishes between the ethics of the public medical life and the ethics of the physician in the patient’s pr...
The Oath compels confidentiality in what is seen or heard as a fundamental principle in the relationship of the physician with his patients. The respect for confidentiality (a component of the modern principle of autonomy) of the information the patient discloses in the course of treatment and outside treatment is an absolute principle. It is notew...
- Helen Askitopoulou, Antonis N. Vgontzas
- 2018
Nov 16, 2016 · Ralph Jones was shot four times fighting in the thick of the Normandy Landings and the Allied push into Germany, with one bullet remaining permanently lodged in his stomach.
People also ask
Did Ralph Jones violate his oath?
What happened to Fulton County’s Joe Jones?
Who is Ralph Jones Jr?
What are the objections to the oath?
What was Ralph Jones' role as a registered agent?
Does the oath prohibit sexual abuse?
Nov 16, 2016 · Ralph Jones was shot four times fighting in the thick of the Normandy Landings and the Allied push into Germany. One bullet remained lodged in his stomach permanently.
