Search results
Aug 29, 2017 · The de Klerks didn’t have the money to buy the home, but Gerry de Klerk allegedly assured the plaintiffs that he was set to receive a “large legal settlement” from the Dutch government. The couple, according to the lawsuit, gave de Klerk and Nelson the option to buy the property for yearly instalments of $119,000 on the home’s $1.7 ...
Nov 11, 2021 · For some in South Africa, FW de Klerk was a great statesman - the Nobel Peace Prize winner who helped end the system of legalised racism which he inherited. For others, he benefited...
For some in South Africa, FW de Klerk was a great statesman - the Nobel Peace Prize winner who helped end the system of legalised racism which he inherited.
In the interim, electoral losses by the NP to the Conservative Party had led de Klerk to call a whites-only referendum on 17 March 1992, which demonstrated overwhelming support among the white minority for reforms and a negotiated settlement and which had therefore solidified his mandate to proceed. [33]
Nov 15, 2021 · What is less well known is that as the first democratic election loomed, De Klerk asked for a legal opinion on the viability of removing cabinet and related records from the custody of the state. He wanted to keep them out of the hands of a future ANC government!
ON 16 NOVEMBER 2009, F W de Klerk told the Global Strategy Forum in London that the fall of the Berlin wall in November 1989 would reverberate through history with similar impact to the fall of the Bastille two hundred years earlier.
People also ask
Did Gerry De Klerk get a 'large legal settlement'?
Who was FW de Klerk?
Why did de Klerk ask for a legal opinion?
How did de Klerk change South Africa?
Does South Africa need to reckon with the de Klerk legacy?
Who ratified de Klerk's move to negotiate with blacks?
Nov 11, 2021 · De Klerk sensed the threat and outmanoeuvred them by offering a "whites only" referendum in 1992, in which a majority of white voters endorsed further reform.
