Search results
- Yes, Apollo 18 is just a work of fiction. But Schuessler (along with perhaps folks at NASA who have dealt with moon hoax conspiracy theorists) worries that some might take the faux-documentary the wrong way. "You're going to see a lot of conspiracy theorists believe that it's real," he says.
www.popularmechanics.com/space/moon-mars/a7166/why-apollo-really-stopped-at-17/
- 2 min
- No stars. Some conspiracy theorists reference the lack of stars in the pictures taken by the Apollo astronauts from the surface of the Moon. Media caption,
- The flapping flag. Another claim is that the famous US flag, which appears in photos of the moment, appears to be flapping in the wind. Doubters say there wouldn't be wind on the Moon as there is no air.
- It wasn't impossible. Some people don't believe in the space shuttle and the missions to the Moon because they think the journey itself was impossible because of something called the Van Allen belts.
- Moon rocks. Another piece of evidence for the landing is the fact that the astronauts came back with rocks from its surface. They returned with more than 842 pounds (382kg) of Moon rocks, which have been shared and studied by scientists in many countries for decades.
- shadows in the Moon landing photos prove the images were faked. Take a look at the image below, and at the full panorama on the NASA website.
- Apollo astronauts could not have survived Earth's radiation field. Earth is surrounded by a zone of charged particles known as the 'Van Allen' radiation belt.
- why are there no stars in pictures of the NASA Moon landings? Here is another Moon landing photograph which has caught conspiracy theorists' eye.
- the Apollo 11 US flag is waving in the wind... but there's no wind on the Moon. "One of the crowning moments in terms of US national pride was seeing the Stars and Stripes on the surface of the Moon," Prof Ojha says.
In this blog, we dig into some of the common questions around the Moon landings, and address the more curious lunar phenomena with the latest data and scientific understanding. A vast weight of evidence supports the fact that humans really did land on the Moon multiple times between 1969 and 1972.
- Photographic Evidence
- Fried by Radiation
- Proof We Walked on The Moon
One of the most popular conspiracy arguments is that there are never any stars in Apollo photos. Free from Earth’s light pollution and hazy atmosphere, you would expect to see thousands of stars in all the astronauts’ images. Unfortunately, this argument rests on the photos being snapped during the lunar night. All manned missions to the Moon took ...
Perhaps the most convincing argument that the landings were faked has to do with something called the Van Allen belts. These are two giant doughnut-shaped belts surrounding the Earth. They are made of highly energetic charged particles from the solar wind. Some people believe humans couldn’t have passed through these belts without being exposed to ...
Of course, until we return to the Moon there will always be anomalies and oddities in the records that can spark new claims that the Moon landings were faked. But it is the sheer size and variety of this record that proves every one of these claims to be false. From the Apollo Moon missions, there are 8,400 publicly available photos, thousands of h...
The most notable claim of these conspiracy theories is that the six crewed landings (1969–1972) were faked and that twelve Apollo astronauts did not actually land on the Moon.
Sep 2, 2011 · First, yes, NASA did plan an Apollo 18. After Apollo 17, NASA scheduled three more missions to the Moon—18, 19 and 20—but those were subsequently grounded. The truth about why,...
Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings is evidence, or analysis of evidence, about the Moon landings that does not come from either NASA or the U.S. government (the first party), or the Apollo Moon landing hoax theorists (the second party).
