Search results
- In contrast to the previously described tests, projective measures are not primarily based on norm-referenced empiric research, but rather on a hypothesis that an individual will “project” his or her feelings, thoughts, needs, attitudes, and conflicts onto an ambiguous stimulus.
www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/projective-test
People also ask
Do projective techniques still exist?
Are projective techniques a legitimate tool for Science and practice?
What are the psychometric properties of a Projective Instrument?
What is the scientific status of projective techniques?
What are the three major projective techniques?
What is a comprehensive review of evidence about projective clinical instruments?
In this monograph, we review the current state of the literature concerning the psychometric properties (norms, reliability, validity, incremental validity, treatment utility) of three major projective instruments: Rorschach Inkblot Test, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), and human figure drawings.
- View Full Text
Although projective techniques continue to be widely used in...
- Login
In this monograph, we review the current state of the...
- Forgotten your password
We would like to show you a description here but the site...
- View Full Text
In this monograph, we review the current state of the literature concerning the psychometric properties (norms, reliability, validity, incremental validity, treatment utility) of three major projective instruments: Rorschach Inkblot Test, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), and human figure drawings.
- Scott O. Lilienfeld, James M. Wood, Howard N. Garb
- 2000
In this monograph, we review the current state of the literature concerning the psychometric properties (norms, reliability, validity, incremental validity, treatment utility) of three major projective instruments: Rorschach Inkblot Test, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), and human figure drawings.
- Scott O. Lilienfeld, James M. Wood, Howard N. Garb
- 2000
Insofar as variation in projective test responses are caused by constructs' capturing phenomena that matter in the lives of individuals, projective techniques are legitimate tools for science and practice.
Based on the results of this bibliometric exercise, one can conclude that although projective measures are not as prominent in the research literature as objective, self-report evaluation methods, projective tests have been and continue to be acceptable assessment methods based on usage by researchers in scientific investigations.
In this chapter, we argue that when selecting psychological tests to be administered in an evaluation, psychologists must employ, not set aside, their knowledge of psychometrics: unreliable projective techniques should be eliminated from consideration.
Current evidence on each of three projective instruments—the Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test, and figure drawings—is reviewed.
