Search results
- The Do-No-Harm approach is the understanding of the impact of aid on existing conflict & its interactions within a particular context, with the goal to limit or prevent unintended negative effects.
www.oxfamnovib.nl/kenniscentrum/resources/blog-kenniscentrum/the-do-no-harm-approach-how-to-ensure-that-our-work-contributes-to-peace-not-conflict
People also ask
What is do no harm?
What is the 'do no harm' doctrine?
Is 'do no harm' a good idea?
What are 'do no harm' principles?
What is the do No Harm project?
What is the do no harm framework?
Jan 30, 2024 · One such principle is the imperative of 'do no harm,' which mandates that UNHCR takes measures to prevent and alleviate any adverse consequences of its actions on the affected populations.
Mar 8, 2021 · Instead, the Do No Harm principle should lead refugee aid agencies to make an active effort to accept responsibility for the harm while taking all necessary steps to mitigate or avoid harming in future interventions.
- Abu Faisal Md. Khaled
- faisal.khaled@bup.edu.bd
- 2021
Jan 13, 2016 · Do No Harm is a leading tool for the application of conflict sensitivity. Conflict sensitivity recognizes that aid, whether development, peacebuilding, or humanitarian assistance, has the potential to support either conflict or peace.
The Do-No-Harm approach is the understanding of the impact of aid on existing conflict [1] & its interactions within a particular context, with the goal to limit or prevent unintended negative effects [2].
Dec 15, 2023 · The ‘do no harm’ doctrine mandates international aid organisations highlight and assess the potential risks involved in their intervention, both prior to and during their deployment, so as to not further aggravate conflict dynamics (Anderson Citation 1999).
The Do No Harm Framework for Analyzing the Impact of Aid on Conflict. Do No Harm also analyzes how an intervention affects the Dividers and Connectors, yielding predictable patterns of impact through Actions. (of organizations) and Behaviors (of staff).
At a practical level, we emphasize a taxonomy of harm that weighs the organizational use of experimental innovation in humanitarian contexts against the potential to result in the following harms: (1) distribution of harm, (2) resource scarcity, and (3) legal liability and reputational damage.