Search results
“The party seeking rectification must show that: (1) the parties had a common continuing intention, whether or not amounting to an agreement, in respect of a particular matter in the instrument to be rectified; (2) there was an outward expression of accord; (3) the intention continued at the time of the execution of the instrument sought to be r...
- 293KB
- 27
The agreement for sale that the Council sent to storer indicated that the Council intended to be binding upon storers acceptance by signing and returning the document. Store had done what was required and therefore was a valid offer and acceptance. Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979)
That arrangement was acted upon in all respects, and an account which William Bromley then kept with Messrs. Rogers, Twogood, & Co., bankers in London, and in which there was a considerable balance standing to his credit, was transferred into the joint names of the two brothers.
Bromley v H & J Quick Ltd [1988] Mrs Bromley and her colleagues were administrative staff working for a car sales firm. The company had earlier undertaken a job evaluation exercise where some jobs were evaluated by a joint panel of management and employees, while others (including those of the claimant and three of the comparators) were ...
Aug 20, 2019 · In the case Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) [11], the promoter of a company, Erlanger, acquired the lease of a phosphate mine in the West Indies for a sum of £55,000. Later he sold the mining rights to the newly incorporated company for £110,000.
Chapter 31.9 – ANNEX L – Table of key right of action cases. Example of personal action staying with bankrupt (personal annoyance). Obligation on officers of the court to act honourably and...
People also ask
What did Leonard Bromley say about rectification?
What was Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co?
Does the law need to be rectified in Chartbrook v Daventry?
May 15, 2022 · William Brandt’s Sons and Co v Dunlop Rubber Co: HL 1905. The court was asked whether instructions given by the bank’s customer to purchasers of rubber to make payment to its bank directly, amounted to an equitable assignment of debts, so that the bank could sue for their recovery.
