Yahoo Web Search

Search results

    • Image courtesy of gerchik.co

      gerchik.co

      • The new AT&T will become the nation's dominant phone company, controlling more than half the telephone and Internet access lines in the U.S. In many ways, the new AT&T will be even stronger than the old Ma Bell because today's company competes in many more markets, including business and consumer data services and paid television.
      www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/at-t-and-bellsouth-why-you-should-care/
  1. People also ask

  2. Dec 5, 2006 · While the companies believe the merger will allow AT&T to roll out new services more quickly, consumer groups worry that a bigger AT&T will hurt competition by putting an even tighter squeeze...

  3. Mar 6, 2009 · AT&T in 2009 looks a lot like AT&T in 1984, only bigger (motto: “local, long-distance and now introducing wireless!”). It’s also more global and more capable. In fact, Ma Bell in general is back, albeit in a three-headed form that comprises the powerful Verizon Communications Inc., Qwest Communications International Inc. and AT&T itself ...

  4. Mar 9, 2006 · AT&T and BellSouth offer conventional telephone service in different regions of the country. AT&T (formerly called “Southwestern Bell”) operates in the Southwest, Far West and the Midwest.

  5. Dec 19, 2008 · Although the Ma Bell monopoly is no more, debate swirls over whether or not the industry is better for it. When AT&T agreed to break itself up 25 years ago, it was seen as one of the most...

    • Brad Reed
  6. Mar 5, 2018 · The government forced AT&T to break up into eight different companies in 1984. Today, almost all of them are once again part of AT&T. Here's how it happened.

  7. Mar 10, 2006 · AT&T’s purchase of Bell South would create a single, more vertically integrated telecommunications provider; to some observers, this increased vertical integration and decreased number of firms means less competition.

  1. People also search for