Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Security

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   Jun 23, 2022 · Systematic Review. The systematic review is a transparent method for identifying, evaluating and summarising the findings of relevant individual studies. The role of the systematic review is to make available evidence for policymakers and academics alike more accessible and reliable.

2. Videos

   • 

     42:48

     youtube.com

     An Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Everything you need to know in 59 minutes

     17 May 2020

     72.5K views

   • 

     3:26

     youtube.com

     The Steps of a Systematic Review

     3 Jan 2018

     191K views

   • 

     3:24

     youtube.com

     What are systematic reviews?

     27 Jan 2016

     408.7K views

   View all

3. journals.sagepub.com › doi › fullSystematic reviews: Structure, form and content - Veronica ...

   journals.sagepub.com › doi › full

   Jul 6, 2021 · A systematic review collects secondary data, and is a synthesis of all available, relevant evidence which brings together all existing primary studies for review (Cochrane 2016). A systematic review differs from other types of literature review in several major ways.

   • Author: Veronica Phillips, Eleanor Barker

   • Publish Year: 2021

4. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articleInformation systems security research agenda: Exploring the ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Dec 1, 2021 · Explores the gap between what practitioners consider to be important and what researchers are currently studying. •. Develop a research agenda in Information Systems Security. This paper undertakes a systematic review of the Information Systems Security literature.

   • Author: Gurpreet Dhillon, Kane Smith, Indika Dissanayaka

   • Publish Year: 2021

5. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articleGuidelines for writing a systematic review - ScienceDirect

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jun 1, 2023 · A Systematic Review (SR) is a synthesis of evidence that is identified and critically appraised to understand a specific topic. SRs are more comprehensive than a Literature Review, which most academics will be familiar with, as they follow a methodical process to identify and analyse existing literature (Cochrane, 2022).

6. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC3894019Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best ...

   pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC3894019

   Systematic reviews aim to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant individual studies over a health-related issue, thereby making the available evidence more accessible to decision makers.

7. onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › fullSystematic reviews: Brief overview of methods, limitations ...

   onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › full

   Dec 19, 2021 · Describes core standards and principles for systematic review and frequently encountered problems. Differentiates between literature reviews and reviewing literature. Addresses quantitative and qualitative research synthesis. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation 12

8. People also ask

   What is a systematic review?

   • The systematic review is a transparent method for identifying, evaluating and summarising the findings of relevant individual studies. The role of the systematic review is to make available evidence for policymakers and academics alike more accessible and reliable.

   Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Security | SpringerLink

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-91735-7_23

   See all results for this question

   What makes a good systematic review?

   • High-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses take great care to find all relevant studies, critically assess each study, synthesize the findings from individual studies in an unbiased manner, and present balanced important summary of findings with due consideration of any flaws in the evidence.

   Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence

   pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3894019/

   See all results for this question

   Does is security research have a literature review?

   • The literature reviews surveyed prominent IS security research in the field – each providing a different characterization of the research.

   Information systems security research agenda: Exploring the gap between

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000408

   See all results for this question

   Why is a systematic review inadvisable?

   • Systematic reviews can be inadvisable for a variety of reasons. It may be that the topic is too new and there are not enough relevant published papers to synthesise and analyse for a systematic review, or, conversely, that many other researchers have already published systematic reviews on the topic.

   Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content

   journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1750458921994693

   See all results for this question

   Does is security research focus on specific streams of research?

   • Since Siponen and Oinas-Kukkonen (2007), all additional literature reviews in IS security research have only been focused on specific streams of research (e.g., compliance) within the field instead of all-encompassing assessments of the direction of IS security research.

   Information systems security research agenda: Exploring the gap between

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000408

   See all results for this question

   What is a paradigmatic view of is security research?

   • In the literature review by Dhillon and Backhouse, 2001, McFadzean et al., 2006, a paradigmatic view of IS security research is adopted. The literature review is based on a basic premise, drawn from Burrell and Morgan (1979) that “all theories of organization rely upon a philosophy of science and a theory of society” (p. 1).

   Information systems security research agenda: Exploring the gap between

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000408

   See all results for this question

9. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Cybersecurity Risk Audit: A Systematic Literature Review

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   Feb 21, 2024 · Cybersecurity Risk Audit: A Systematic Literature Review. Chapter. First Online: 21 February 2024. pp 275–301. Cite this chapter. Download book PDF. Download book EPUB. New Perspectives in Software Engineering. Isaac D. Sanchez-Garcia, Angel M. Rea-Guaman, Tomás San Feliu Gilabert & Jose A. Calvo-Manzano.