justanswer.co.uk has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Connect With A Verified Solicitor In Minutes. No Waiting For Appointments. Fast & Simple. 3 Simple Steps - Describe Your Issue, Chat With Solicitor, Save Time & Money
- Contact Us
Ask a question and get an answer to
your question from a verified ...
- Talk To Solicitor Online
Get 1-on-1 Answers 24/7.
Experts Are Ready To Help. Ask Now!
- Ask a Question
Find out what you are
saying.-We're here to help you.
- JustAnswer Experts Q&A
An Expert Will Answer in Minutes!
Ask a Question, Get An Answer ASAP.
- Contact Us
Search results
Nov 26, 2004 · Mrs Threlfall disputed Patient A's account of the consultation. (a) She said the only symptom he described was the sudden appearance of a large floater in his right eye, at the beginning of the week, and that vision was coming and going in his left eye.
- Case No: CO/2955/2004
- England & Wales
- 26 November 2004
- [2004] EWHC 2683 (Admin)
Jun 20, 2024 · Mrs Threlfall said it took her some time to realise she had become a full-time carer for her husband. While she was looking after him, she joined the Carers Support Centre in Fishponds, to meet...
Mrs Threlfall disputed Patient A's account of the consultation. (a) She said the only symptom he described was the sudden appearance of a large floater in his right eye, at the beginning of the week, and that vision was coming and going in his left eye.
- Facts
- Issues
- Holdings
- Reasoning
The Appellant, a registered ophthalmic optician, appealed under section 23 of the Opticians Act 1989 from a decision of the Disciplinary Committee of the General Optical Council ("the GOC"), made on 21 May 2004. The Disciplinary Committee found her guilty of serious professional misconduct and imposed a penalty order of 500. The charge against Mrs ...
Whether the evidence before the Disciplinary Committee justified the finding of serious professional misconductWhether the Appellant was entitled to put her witness statement in evidenceWhether the Disciplinary Committee was required to give reasons for its decisionWhether the Appellant's actions amounted to serious professional misconductThe High Court held that the Appellant had been guilty of serious professional misconduct. The Court also held that the Appellant was not entitled to put her witness statement in evidence, but that the late reasons given by the Disciplinary Committee for its decision would be accepted. The Court further held that the Disciplinary Committee was not ...
The Court reasoned that the Appellant's failure to refer the patient to an ophthalmologist in a timely manner was a breach of her duty to use reasonable care and skill, and could constitute serious professional misconduct. The Court also noted that serious professional misconduct does not require moral turpitude, but rather a falling short of accep...
May 19, 2005 · A Lancashire optometrist won her battle against the GOC, after its finding of serious professional misconduct against her was quashed by a High Court judge. Nicole Threlfall had been found guilty of allegations against her and fined 500 by the Council's disciplinary committee in May this year.
Dec 17, 2012 · Facts. The Claimant, who was formerly employed as Head of Media by the First Defendant ("ECD") from 3 February 2003 to 19 September 2008, brought a claim for breach of contract against ECD and its managing director, Mr Glenn Whitney, who is the Second Defendant.
Part 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) sets out the modern approach to service of court documents. Although special rules apply to some specific documents - for example bankruptcy petitions – most documents are now served by sending them to a party by ordinary pre-paid post.
