Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. On July 23, 2012 during Raw 1000, the Brothers of Destruction reunited against Jinder Mahal, Curt Hawkins, Tyler Reks, Hunico, Camacho and Drew McIntyre when they were planning to attack Kane.

  2. Gettys blackmails Kane, meeting with him and his wife at Susan's apartment, but Kane refuses to drop out of the race despite Gettys' leverage. The scandal goes public and Kane loses the election decisively.

  3. These faults eventually cause Kane to lose his paper, fortune, friends, and beloved second wife, Susan. Thompson, the reporter, never does find out what Kane meant by "Rosebud." Giving up the quest, Thompson is leaving Kane’s abandoned castle, Xanadu, when the camera pans a scene of workers burning some of Kane’s less valuable possessions.

  4. Dec 20, 2010 · As the newsreel runs through Kane’s life, we begin to imagine this distant, unapproachable entity. We learn that he married twice, divorced the same number of times. His first wife died in 1918, in an automobile accident along with their son. His second wife, Susan Alexander (Dorothy Comingore), was a singer.

    • why did kane lose his wife on friends reunion1
    • why did kane lose his wife on friends reunion2
    • why did kane lose his wife on friends reunion3
    • why did kane lose his wife on friends reunion4
    • why did kane lose his wife on friends reunion5
  5. Feb 5, 2023 · The romance between the two was admittedly a bit of a whirlwind, with the pair getting engaged only eight months after their first began dating in April 2017. Then in October 2018, the couple...

  6. Kane is dead when the film begins, and we learn about him only through the accounts given by his old friends and lovers. Each person has a different perception of Kane, and his or her memories are not fully reliable.

  7. People also ask

  8. Kane has fallen from being able to rouse a major rally full of supporters to spring to their feet, to standing alone in an ovation for his wife's opera debut, which is unabashedly mediocre. The result is, as Kael indicates, seemingly part of a dramatic con, using Susan to maintain relevance and recapture public adoration.

  1. People also search for