Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. pressbooks.pub › earlybritishlit › chapter14 Geoffrey of Monmouth: A History of the Kings of Britain

   pressbooks.pub › earlybritishlit › chapter

   • Cached

   Geoffrey ends his work by saying he will leave the Saxon kings to the Saxon historians and recommends his contemporaries do the same: “I advise them to be silent concerning the kings of the Britons.”

2. www.menofthewest.net › geoffrey-of-monmouth-andGeoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur - Men Of The West

   www.menofthewest.net › geoffrey-of-monmouth-and

   • Cached

   Apr 9, 2019 · Geoffrey ends by requesting historians, his contemporaries, such as William of Malmesbury, “to be silent concerning the “History of the Britons,” since they have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany”.

   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 

3. www.cambridge.org › core › books1 - ‘But here Geoffrey falls silent’: Death, Arthur, and the

   www.cambridge.org › core › books

   • Cached

   Sep 12, 2012 · After pages of what most commentators today regard as sheer invention, Geoffrey of Monmouth suddenly pauses his account of King Arthur to refer his audience to the ancient British book that he says is the source of his Historia regum Britannie:

4. www.britannica.com › biography › Geoffrey-of-MonmouthGeoffrey Of Monmouth | Medieval Bishop & Chronicler - Britannica

   www.britannica.com › biography › Geoffrey-of-Monmouth

   • Cached

   Geoffrey Of Monmouth (died 1155) was a medieval English chronicler and bishop of St. Asaph (1152), whose major work, the Historia regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain), brought the figure of Arthur into European literature.

   • Author: The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

5. www.jstor.org › stable › pdfGEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH'S MOTIVES FOR WRITING HIS HISTORIA

   www.jstor.org › stable › pdf

   Now why did he think this a good thing to do? The first reason is racial patriotism. There is no better measure of a people's civilization, as Gaston Paris once said, than its interest in its own history. The writing of national histories was a feature of the rapid advance of culture in the first

6. talesofbritainandireland.com › geoffrey-of-monmouthGeoffrey of Monmouth - Tales of Britain and Ireland

   talesofbritainandireland.com › geoffrey-of-monmouth

   “But I advise them [Other Historians] to be silent concerning the kings of the Britons, since they have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany. Geoffrey of Monmouth, Closing to “The History of the Kings of Britain”

7. People also ask

   Why did Geoffrey ask historians to be silent?

   • Geoffrey ends by requesting historians, his contemporaries, such as William of Malmesbury, “to be silent concerning the “History of the Britons,” sincethey have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany”. This is mere open banter. Geoffrey was not likely to show them that book!

   Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur

   www.menofthewest.net/geoffrey-of-monmouth-and-the-stories-of-arthur/

   See all results for this question

   Should the British be silent about the kings of the British?

   • But I advise them to be silent concerning the kings of the Britons, since they have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany, and which being a true history, published in honour of those princes, I have thus taken care to translate. Thompson, Aaron and J.A. Giles.

   14 Geoffrey of Monmouth: A History of the Kings of Britain

   pressbooks.pub/earlybritishlit/chapter/geoffrey-of-monmouth-a-history-of-the-kings-of-britain/

   See all results for this question

   Was Geoffrey a real historian?

   • Geoffrey, as has been said, isnot a real historian, but something much more interesting. He introduced to the world the story of King Arthur, which at once became the source and centre of hundreds of French romances, in verse or prose, and of poetry down to Tennyson and William Morris.

   Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur

   www.menofthewest.net/geoffrey-of-monmouth-and-the-stories-of-arthur/

   See all results for this question

   Who gave Geoffrey A copy of the history of the Kings?

   • Geoffrey claimed that the ancient text from which he gleaned his translations was given to him by a man he had befriended at the university, an archdeacon of Oxford. The History of the Kings of Britain (Historia regum Britanniae) was likely completed around 1138 during a tumultuous period of civil war in England.

   14 Geoffrey of Monmouth: A History of the Kings of Britain

   pressbooks.pub/earlybritishlit/chapter/geoffrey-of-monmouth-a-history-of-the-kings-of-britain/

   See all results for this question

   Why was the history of the kings of Britain a faulty history book?

   • As Geoffrey’s book (or translation) was largely about mythology and folklore, the use of the title, The History of the Kings of Britain, caused the text to be filed away as a faulty history book rather than a compelling collection of British myths and folk stories.

   The Unlikely Man Who Popularized The Stories Of King Arthur—Geoffre…

   thehistorianshut.com/2017/03/30/the-unlikely-man-who-popularized-the-stories-of-king-arthur-geoffrey-of-monmouth/

   See all results for this question

   Why was Geoffrey a good book?

   • Geoffrey’s was a book that gave delight to every one, ladies as well as men, for in the marriage of the traitor Modred with Guinevere the wife of Arthur, and in Arthur’s revenge, was the germ of a world of romances.

   Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur

   www.menofthewest.net/geoffrey-of-monmouth-and-the-stories-of-arthur/

   See all results for this question

8. thehistorianshut.com › 2017/03/30 › the-unlikely-manThe Unlikely Man Who Popularized The ... - The Historian's Hut

   thehistorianshut.com › 2017/03/30 › the-unlikely-man

   Mar 30, 2017 · As Geoffrey’s book (or translation) was largely about mythology and folklore, the use of the title, The History of the Kings of Britain, caused the text to be filed away as a faulty history book rather than a compelling collection of British myths and folk stories.