Search results
Jul 13, 2012 · His name was Geoffrey of Monmouth and his words were believed implicitly, from the time of their creation in the 12th century right down to the days of Queen Elizabeth.
- The 1925 Battle of Ammanford
The industrial history of Wales is studded with strikes,...
- The 1925 Battle of Ammanford
Geoffrey ends his work by saying he will leave the Saxon kings to the Saxon historians and recommends his contemporaries do the same: “I advise them to be silent concerning the kings of the Britons.”
Geoffrey Of Monmouth (died 1155) was a medieval English chronicler and bishop of St. Asaph (1152), whose major work, the Historia regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain), brought the figure of Arthur into European literature. In three passages of the Historia Geoffrey describes himself as “Galfridus Monemutensis,” an indication ...
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Now why did he think this a good thing to do? The first reason is racial patriotism. There is no better measure of a people's civilization, as Gaston Paris once said, than its interest in its own history. The writing of national histories was a feature of the rapid advance of culture in the first
Apr 9, 2019 · Geoffrey ends by requesting historians, his contemporaries, such as William of Malmesbury, “to be silent concerning the “History of the Britons,” since they have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany”.
Mar 30, 2017 · As Geoffrey’s book (or translation) was largely about mythology and folklore, the use of the title, The History of the Kings of Britain, caused the text to be filed away as a faulty history book rather than a compelling collection of British myths and folk stories.
People also ask
Why did Geoffrey ask historians to be silent?
Was Geoffrey a good historian?
Why was the history of the kings of Britain a faulty history book?
What if Geoffrey of Monmouth brought back Arthurian literature?
Why was Geoffrey a good book?
Where did Geoffrey's version of British history come from?
But dating almost from its genesis Geoffrey’s work came in for some serious criticism from sceptical scholars searching for true history, in spite of Geoffrey’s “I have an ancient book” defence.