Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. pressbooks.pub › earlybritishlit › chapter14 Geoffrey of Monmouth: A History of the Kings of Britain

   pressbooks.pub › earlybritishlit › chapter

   • Cached

   Geoffrey ends his work by saying he will leave the Saxon kings to the Saxon historians and recommends his contemporaries do the same: “I advise them to be silent concerning the kings of the Britons.”

2. www.menofthewest.net › geoffrey-of-monmouth-andGeoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur - Men Of The West

   www.menofthewest.net › geoffrey-of-monmouth-and

   • Cached

   Apr 9, 2019 · Geoffrey ends by requesting historians, his contemporaries, such as William of Malmesbury, “to be silent concerning the “History of the Britons,” since they have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany”.

   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 

3. www.britannica.com › biography › Geoffrey-of-MonmouthGeoffrey Of Monmouth | Medieval Bishop & Chronicler - Britannica

   www.britannica.com › biography › Geoffrey-of-Monmouth

   • Cached

   Geoffrey Of Monmouth (died 1155) was a medieval English chronicler and bishop of St. Asaph (1152), whose major work, the Historia regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain), brought the figure of Arthur into European literature.

   • Author: The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

4. www.cambridge.org › core › books1 - ‘But here Geoffrey falls silent’: Death, Arthur, and the

   www.cambridge.org › core › books

   • Cached

   Sep 12, 2012 · After pages of what most commentators today regard as sheer invention, Geoffrey of Monmouth suddenly pauses his account of King Arthur to refer his audience to the ancient British book that he says is the source of his Historia regum Britannie:

5. www.jstor.org › stable › pdfGEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH'S MOTIVES FOR WRITING HIS HISTORIA

   www.jstor.org › stable › pdf

   Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain, so vastly influential not only on subsequent literature, but also on historiography and even politics, was written between 1130 and 1138.

6. talesofbritainandireland.com › geoffrey-of-monmouthGeoffrey of Monmouth - Tales of Britain and Ireland

   talesofbritainandireland.com › geoffrey-of-monmouth

   “But I advise them [Other Historians] to be silent concerning the kings of the Britons, since they have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany. Geoffrey of Monmouth, Closing to “The History of the Kings of Britain”

7. People also ask

   Why did Geoffrey ask historians to be silent?

   • Geoffrey ends by requesting historians, his contemporaries, such as William of Malmesbury, “to be silent concerning the “History of the Britons,” sincethey have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany”. This is mere open banter. Geoffrey was not likely to show them that book!

   Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur

   www.menofthewest.net/geoffrey-of-monmouth-and-the-stories-of-arthur/

   See all results for this question

   Was Geoffrey a real historian?

   • Geoffrey, as has been said, isnot a real historian, but something much more interesting. He introduced to the world the story of King Arthur, which at once became the source and centre of hundreds of French romances, in verse or prose, and of poetry down to Tennyson and William Morris.

   Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur

   www.menofthewest.net/geoffrey-of-monmouth-and-the-stories-of-arthur/

   See all results for this question

   Who gave Geoffrey A copy of the history of the Kings?

   • Geoffrey claimed that the ancient text from which he gleaned his translations was given to him by a man he had befriended at the university, an archdeacon of Oxford. The History of the Kings of Britain (Historia regum Britanniae) was likely completed around 1138 during a tumultuous period of civil war in England.

   14 Geoffrey of Monmouth: A History of the Kings of Britain

   pressbooks.pub/earlybritishlit/chapter/geoffrey-of-monmouth-a-history-of-the-kings-of-britain/

   See all results for this question

   Why was Geoffrey a good book?

   • Geoffrey’s was a book that gave delight to every one, ladies as well as men, for in the marriage of the traitor Modred with Guinevere the wife of Arthur, and in Arthur’s revenge, was the germ of a world of romances.

   Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Stories of Arthur

   www.menofthewest.net/geoffrey-of-monmouth-and-the-stories-of-arthur/

   See all results for this question

   Should the British be silent about the kings of the British?

   • But I advise them to be silent concerning the kings of the Britons, since they have not that book written in the British tongue, which Walter, archdeacon of Oxford, brought out of Brittany, and which being a true history, published in honour of those princes, I have thus taken care to translate. Thompson, Aaron and J.A. Giles.

   14 Geoffrey of Monmouth: A History of the Kings of Britain

   pressbooks.pub/earlybritishlit/chapter/geoffrey-of-monmouth-a-history-of-the-kings-of-britain/

   See all results for this question

   Did Geoffrey of Monmouth live in Caerleon?

   • The proximity of Monmouth to Caerleon is significant, for it was Geoffrey of Monmouth who named it the Court of King Arthur. Of course, the question of whether or not Geoffrey of Monmouth was truly from Monmouth still remains, and the authenticity of his Welsh heritage is frequently questioned.

   Geoffrey of Monmouth: The Man Who Gave Us King Arthur and Merlin

   www.thecollector.com/who-was-geoffrey-of-monmouth/

   See all results for this question

8. www.thecollector.com › who-was-geoffrey-of-monmouthGeoffrey of Monmouth: The Man Who Gave Us King Arthur and Merlin

   www.thecollector.com › who-was-geoffrey-of-monmouth

   • Cached

   Mar 10, 2024 · Geoffrey of Monmouth’s work on history treads a murky line between fact and fiction, especially considering his creative liberties with King Arthur. Here’s why: Doubt cast on other writings: His fictionalized account of Arthur raises questions about the accuracy of his other historical writings.