Search results
The husband’s solicitor, who owes a high duty to the court, will read them and disclose those of them that are both admissible and relevant to the wife’s claim, pursuant to the husband’s duty of full and frank disclosure.
Turning to case law post Imerman, two cases in particular, illustrate the application of the law. The first of these is the case of Thum v Thum [2019] EWFC 25. This was for the Wife’s enforcement application on the 16 th of April 2019 relating to a disclosure order which had been made at the First Appointment (“FDA”) on the 5 th of ...
Jul 1, 2019 · The hearing concerned the husband’s application to revoke an order that he disclose Imerman documents, some of which related to his employers. The husband’s justification was that if he complied with the order he was at risk of both civil sanction and criminal prosecution in Germany.
Jul 29, 2010 · The Court of Appeal has ruled in the case of Imerman that that the Hildebrand rules, which historically have enabled a wife or husband to secretly obtain, copy and use each others' documents in divorce proceedings, have "no basis in law" and are unlawful.
Mar 24, 2012 · George Zimmerman, the 28-year-old former altar boy whose shooting of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, has caused a national uproar, has withdrawn into seclusion. His lawyer says he’s...
Jun 4, 2015 · Solicitor Advocate. Court of Appeal look again at unlawfully obtained documents. In Arbili v Arbili [2015] EWCA Civ 542 the duties of a client and his/her lawyer over documents unlawfully obtained by the client was reviewed by the Court of Appeal. There were two appeals.
People also ask
How did Mr Imerman apply for a restraining order?
What did Mrs Imerman do in the financial remedy proceedings?
Can Vivian Imerman return information taken by his ex-wife's brothers?
Feb 26, 2022 · Zimmerman argued that he had acted in self-defence and argued he was within his rights to fire under the “stand your ground” law, and was acquitted of second-degree murder and manslaughter...
