Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.sciencedirect.com › science › article“Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jul 1, 2017 · We took an initial list of Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs) associated with the speech act of apology, and used a novel form of collocational analysis to reveal “hidden manifestations” (Kohnen, 2007) of apologies in the BBC.

   • Author: Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe

   • Publish Year: 2017

2. link.springer.com › article › 10Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   May 16, 2018 · As evidence he cites Meier (1998), 1 who in turn quotes, for instance, Holmes (1990) and Olshtain (1989). Holmes (1990: 167) reports 96% of apologies in New Zealand English to contain an IFID, and Olshtain (1989: 164) 75% in Australian English.

   • Author: Andreas H. Jucker
   • Email: ahjucker@es.uzh.ch

   • Publish Year: 2018

3. www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk › 4794“Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”: A corpus pragmatic ...

   www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk › 4794

   • Cached

   This chapter studies the form oops and its function as an Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) signalling apologies in a corpus of blog posts and reader comments.

   • Author: Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe

   • Publish Year: 2017

4. link.springer.com › article › 10“I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for Apologies ...

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Feb 15, 2017 · Deutschmann (2003), therefore, based his study of apologies in a 5 million word sub-section of the spoken component of the BNC on a list of eight IFIDs and their variants (afraid, apologise, apology, excuse, forgive, pardon, regret and sorry).

   • Author: Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe

   • Publish Year: 2017

5. www.researchgate.net › figure › Frequency-of-perFrequency of performative apology expressions (IFIDs) in the ...

   www.researchgate.net › figure › Frequency-of-per

   Unlike the request speech acts, an apology is more corpus-based (McAllister, 2015) and depends on taking advantage of Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs), which means there are many ...

6. benjamins.com › online › pragRieger: “I want a real apology” - benjamins.com

   benjamins.com › online › prag

   Apologies are part of the ever-present relational work, i.e., co-constructed and co-negotiated, emergent relationships in a situated social context. Hence, the focus is not on the illocutionary force indicating device (IFID) alone, nor on the turn in which the IFID is produced, but on the interactional exchange in situ.

7. People also ask

   Who cites IFID apologies?

   • As evidence he cites Meier (1998), 1 who in turn quotes, for instance, Holmes (1990) and Olshtain (1989). Holmes (1990: 167) reports 96% of apologies in New Zealand English to contain an IFID, and Olshtain (1989: 164) 75% in Australian English. However, Holmes used the diary method and Olshtain discourse completion tasks (DCTs).

   Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41701-018-0038-y

   See all results for this question

   Are IFIDs associated with the speech act of apology?

   • We took an initial list of Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs) associated with the speech act of apology, and used a novel form of collocational analysis to reveal “hidden manifestations” ( Kohnen, 2007) of apologies in the BBC.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

   Is the IFID apologies the overwhelming favorite?

   • 1 3 have conrmed that the IFID sorryis “the overwhelming favorite” (Meier, 1998: p. 216), ranging from 79% of all apologies in New Zealand English (cf. Hol- mes, 1990) to 84% in spoken British English (cf. Aijmer, 1996).

   Conceptualizing Illocutions in Context: A Variationist ... - Springer

   link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41701-022-00115-w.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Is OOPs an illocutionary force indicating device with an apology function?

   • Oops as an Illocutionary Force Indicating Device with an apology function in blogs. Combining the analysis of shared and unique collocates to uncover new IFIDs. This article studies the form oops and its function as an Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) signalling apologies in a corpus of blog posts and reader comments.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

   Is OOPs an apology IFID?

   • In this paper, we look more closely at the uses of oops as an apology IFID in the BBC. Our initial analyses suggest that, although oops is often accompanied by a prototypical apology IFID such as sorry, this is not always the case and it appears that oops may be acting as an apology IFID in its own right in blog data.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

   Why do we use apology IFIDs in a blog?

   • That is to say that the form oops displays apologetic illocutionary force in the medium of the blog, in addition to the more routinised apology IFIDs but with the added stylistic effect of creating a conversational and colloquial impression in a written type of text, thus contributing to an increased perception of communicative immediacy.

   “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant”. A corpus pragmatic analysis of

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616307020

   See all results for this question

8. link.springer.com › content › pdfConceptualizing Illocutions in Context: A Variationist ...

   link.springer.com › content › pdf

   More recent influential studies, which have zoomed in on investigating IFIDs themselves, have confirmed that the IFID sorry is “the overwhelming favorite” (Meier, 1998: p. 216), ranging from 79% of all apologies in New Zealand English (cf. Hol-mes, 1990) to 84% in spoken British English (cf. Aijmer, 1996).