Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between ...

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   Sep 19, 2018 · In a cognitive map —the main outcome of the psychometric paradigm and one of the icons of risk perception research—the hazards are located in the space between the two principal components dread risk and unknown risk according to people’s ratings on these two dimensions.

   • Author: Vivianne H. M. Visschers, Michael Siegrist

   • Publish Year: 2018

2. journals.sagepub.com › doi › fullPsychological Drivers of Individual Differences in Risk ...

   journals.sagepub.com › doi › full

   Sep 22, 2021 · Interindividual differences in risk perception may emerge because of individuals’ idiosyncratic (and potentially dynamic) evaluations of, or knowledge about, a specific hazard—or because of generic and relatively stable characteristics of persons themselves.

   • Author: Renato Frey

   • Publish Year: 2021

3. oxfordre.com › communication › displayRisk Perceptions and Risk Characteristics | Oxford Research ...

   oxfordre.com › communication › display

   • Cached

   According to the psychometric paradigm, people judge the riskiness of a hazard based on the combination of a range of (perceived) risk characteristics, which include the following: the severity of the risk is not controllable; the risk makes people feel dread; the risk could be globally catastrophic; the risk is certain to be fatal; people will ...

4. www.cambridge.org › core › booksHazard perception (Chapter 2) - The Psychology of Risk

   www.cambridge.org › core › books

   • Cached

   Dec 16, 2010 · Chapter preview. In Chapter 2 the distinction between risk assessment and risk perception is described, and the reasons why both should be understood are considered. In risk assessment, the relationship between risk estimation and risk evaluation is examined.

5. www.simplypsychology.org › experimental-methodExperimental Method In Psychology

   www.simplypsychology.org › experimental-method

   • Cached

   Sep 25, 2023 · A field experiment is a research method in psychology that takes place in a natural, real-world setting. It is similar to a laboratory experiment in that the experimenter manipulates one or more independent variables and measures the effects on the dependent variable.

6. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articlePsychosocial safety behavior: A scoping review of behavior ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Feb 1, 2023 · Introduction: In an era of workplace safety where psychosocial risks are widely recognized as occupational hazards, emerging research has sought to clarify the impact of these risks and the requisite interventions for improving psychosocial safety climate and reducing psychological injury risk.

7. People also ask

   How do people perceive a hazard?

   • Various factors have been found to explain how people perceive a hazard, such as the risk’s characteristics, individual differences, the setting, society, the information provided, and how the risk is mentally processed. Two important research lines can be identified in the field of risk perception.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   Are psychosocial risks occupational hazards?

   • Introduction: In an era of workplace safety where psychosocial risks are widely recognized as occupational hazards, emerging research has sought to clarify the impact of these risks and the requisite interventions for improving psychosocial safety climate and reducing psychological injury risk.

   Psychosocial safety behavior: A scoping review of behavior-based

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437522001578

   See all results for this question

   Is it worth educating people about a hazard?

   • Hence, although some people may hold values that hinder the acknowledgment of a hazard (e.g., in relation to climate change), it is still worthwhile informing and educating them about the hazard, as this knowledge acquisition will lead to greater concern about the risk and—eventually—to the acceptance of risk mitigation efforts.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   How do you explain acceptance of hazards?

   • The acceptance of certain hazards can be best explained by looking at people’s trust, perceived benefits, and perceived risks, whereas others are better clarified by looking at people’s values, knowledge, and perceptions of risk.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   How do you assess people's knowledge about hazards?

   • 3. People’s knowledge about hazards should be considered when explaining their perceptions and acceptance of a risk, but only if this knowledge is assessed objectively, using a multidimensional scale that contains concrete and relevant items, rather than using, for example, a general science knowledge scale.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   What is a psychosocial hazard?

   • Referring to psychosocial hazards, these specific aspects of work organization, design, and management have the inherent potential to cause adverse effects on individual (e.g., health and safety) and/or organizational (e.g., reduced productivity) outcomes (Leka et al., 2015).

   Review Psychosocial factors and safety in high-risk industries: A

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753522002879

   See all results for this question

8. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articlePsychosocial factors and safety in high-risk industries: A ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jan 1, 2023 · Considered from a psychological perspective, the primary objective of this study is therefore to systematically review existing associations between psychosocial work characteristics and safety in high-risk industries.