Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between ...

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   Sep 19, 2018 · In a cognitive map —the main outcome of the psychometric paradigm and one of the icons of risk perception research—the hazards are located in the space between the two principal components dread risk and unknown risk according to people’s ratings on these two dimensions.

   • Author: Vivianne H. M. Visschers, Michael Siegrist

   • Publish Year: 2018

2. www.cambridge.org › core › booksHazard perception (Chapter 2) - The Psychology of Risk

   www.cambridge.org › core › books

   • Cached

   Dec 16, 2010 · Summary. Chapter preview. In Chapter 2 the distinction between risk assessment and risk perception is described, and the reasons why both should be understood are considered. In risk assessment, the relationship between risk estimation and risk evaluation is examined.

3. studyrocket.co.uk › revision › a-level-psychologyLocation of Research – A Level Psychology ... - Study Rocket

   studyrocket.co.uk › revision › a-level-psychology

   • Cached

   Regardless of the location, researchers must adhere to ethical guidelines such as informed consent, confidentiality, and avoidance of harm. Different locations may present unique ethical challenges, and thus the selection of location should also factor in the ethical implications.

4. www.simplypsychology.org › experimental-methodExperimental Method In Psychology

   www.simplypsychology.org › experimental-method

   • Cached

   Sep 25, 2023 · A field experiment is a research method in psychology that takes place in a natural, real-world setting. It is similar to a laboratory experiment in that the experimenter manipulates one or more independent variables and measures the effects on the dependent variable.

5. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articlePsychosocial factors and safety in high-risk industries: A ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jan 1, 2023 · Most large-scale industrial catastrophes (like the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, or Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear disaster) result from a combination of faults in technical arrangements and neglected social structures featuring a workplace.

6. journals.sagepub.com › doi › fullThe Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of ...

   journals.sagepub.com › doi › full

   Jan 18, 2019 · Through an electronic literature search (using Web of Science [WoS]) and manual selection of relevant entries, we collected empirical publications that contained an empirical measure and/or manipulation that was characterized by the authors as relevant to “morality.”

7. People also ask

   How do people perceive a hazard?

   • Various factors have been found to explain how people perceive a hazard, such as the risk’s characteristics, individual differences, the setting, society, the information provided, and how the risk is mentally processed. Two important research lines can be identified in the field of risk perception.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   Is it worth educating people about a hazard?

   • Hence, although some people may hold values that hinder the acknowledgment of a hazard (e.g., in relation to climate change), it is still worthwhile informing and educating them about the hazard, as this knowledge acquisition will lead to greater concern about the risk and—eventually—to the acceptance of risk mitigation efforts.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   How do you assess people's knowledge about hazards?

   • 3. People’s knowledge about hazards should be considered when explaining their perceptions and acceptance of a risk, but only if this knowledge is assessed objectively, using a multidimensional scale that contains concrete and relevant items, rather than using, for example, a general science knowledge scale.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   What factors affect public perception of a hazard?

   • We reviewed the findings around the psychometric paradigm of risk perception and around six factors (i.e., perceived benefits, knowledge, trust, affect, human values, and fairness) that can be taken into account when examining the public’s perception of a hazard and may therefore be worthwhile to consider when communicating with the public.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   How do you explain acceptance of hazards?

   • The acceptance of certain hazards can be best explained by looking at people’s trust, perceived benefits, and perceived risks, whereas others are better clarified by looking at people’s values, knowledge, and perceptions of risk.

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

   What factors explain the perception and acceptance of a hazard?

   • A final factor that can explain the perception and acceptance of a hazard is perceived fairness. Fairness can concern various issues. First, people can evaluate to what extent a hazard’s consequences are equally distributed over different people and regions (i.e., outcome or distributional fairness; Tyler, 2000).

   Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-92478-6_3

   See all results for this question

8. www.tandfonline.com › doi › fullDisaster risk reduction: Psychological perspectives on ...

   www.tandfonline.com › doi › full

   Nov 20, 2020 · Preparedness is an important UNISDR disaster risk reduction goal. Levels of natural hazard preparedness are low. Preparedness theories inform understanding of factors that account for differences in levels of preparedness and how practical preparedness strategies can be developed.